H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Claudia Porwik vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-0
Claudia Porwik holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1992 US Open second round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Claudia Porwik | 7-5 7-5 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Porwik | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |