H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Claudia Porwik vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-1

Claudia Porwik and Mareen Louie Harper are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mareen Louie Harper leads 1–0 on grass, while Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1991 Wimbledon round of 128 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Porwik
GER Age 57
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mareen Louie Harper 6-4 6-1 Claudia Porwik #93 Match data Jun 26, 1991* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Claudia Porwik #53 6-3 5-7 7-5 Mareen Louie Harper Match data Mar 16, 1988* R64 Key Biscayne Category 6 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudia Porwik #579 #29 148 1,786 114 146 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,910 177 239 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Porwik Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1986 6–5 54.5% #96 1,577 0 0 1978 7–12 36.8% — 1,588 0 0
18 1987 13–19 40.6% #104 1,581 0 0 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,568 0 0
19 1988 11–16 40.7% #68 1,571 0 0 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,714 0 0
20 1989 19–18 51.4% #75 1,660 0 0 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,743 0 0
21 1990 18–17 51.4% #29 1,667 0 0 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,654 0 0
22 1991 14–20 41.2% #80 1,644 0 0 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,671 0 0
23 1992 12–18 40.0% #98 1,605 0 0 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,733 0 1
24 1993 13–20 39.4% #92 1,601 0 0 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,776 0 2
25 1994 0–1 0.0% #256 1,585 0 0 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,679 0 2
26 1995 4–7 36.4% #133 1,551 0 0 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 1996 4–5 44.4% #153 1,563 0 0 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,536 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudia Porwik Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1987 4 7 11 36.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 1989 15 13 28 53.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1990 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1991 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1992 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1995 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1996 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 83 156 46.8% 13 21 34 38.2% 11 20 31 35.5% 17 22 39 43.6% — 104 118 222 46.8% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudia Porwik Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1520 116.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 1986 1577 117.2 — — — — +14 +33 — 50.0% -0.42 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +0.65 1978 1589 122.4 — — — — +31 -31 — 34.1% -1.25 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) 108.1 -0.33
18 1987 1582 120.5 — — — — -4 +32 -42 44.7% -0.46 4–8 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 97.8 +1.43 1979 1568 121.3 — — — — +25 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.42
19 1988 1572 125.4 — — — — +20 -30 +14 41.4% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 103.4 +0.38 1980 1714 128.5 — — — — -41 -153 -36 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.6 +1.57
20 1989 1661 127.0 — — — — 0 -72 — 52.9% +0.09 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.85 1981 1743 134.3 — — — — -2 — -72 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 -1.63
21 1990 1667 133.5 — — — — +11 — — 52.5% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +1.00 1982 1655 124.8 — — — — -27 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.27
22 1991 1645 123.9 — — — — +28 -98 — 42.7% -0.60 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -1.33 1983 1671 132.0 — — — — -14 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.4 -0.99
23 1992 1606 119.1 — — — — +1 — -25 43.3% -0.63 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.85 1984 1733 127.5 — — — — +24 — -94 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.67
24 1993 1601 124.1 — — — — -13 -41 +10 42.3% -0.62 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.9 -0.38 1985 1777 143.7 — — — — +52 — -157 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.01
25 1994 1585 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.19 1986 1680 121.2 — — — — +20 — -65 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.39
26 1995 1551 111.6 — — — — +11 — — 44.4% +0.07 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 95.2 -0.10 1987 1624 119.5 — — — — +6 — -17 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.33
27 1996 1564 110.4 — — — — +28 — — 55.0% +0.25 1–3 (25%) — — +0.74 1988 1614 129.1 — — — — +11 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.29
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1576 117.3 — — — — -17 — -21 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.33
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1590 128.4 — — — — +10 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1545 105.4 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1787 129.2 — — — — +7 -22 -6 46.3% -0.33 31–46 (40%) 30–23 (57%) 98.7 +2.04 — 1911 135.2 — — — — +7 -78 -59 42.4% -0.57 76–56 (58%) 40–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.