H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Claudia Porwik vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-3

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 3–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1992 Essen fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Porwik
GER Age 57
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 7, 1992* Essen WTA 250 R16 Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-3 6-3 Claudia Porwik #81 Match data
Jan 28, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #11 6-2 6-1 Claudia Porwik #63 Match data
May 18, 1989* Berlin WTA 500 R32 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #17 5-7 6-0 6-2 Claudia Porwik #110 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Porwik #579 #29 148 1,788 114 146 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Porwik Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1986 6–5 54.5% #96 1,576 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1987 13–19 40.6% #104 1,582 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1988 11–16 40.7% #68 1,572 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1989 19–18 51.4% #75 1,662 0 0 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1990 18–17 51.4% #29 1,667 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1991 14–20 41.2% #80 1,645 0 0 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1992 12–18 40.0% #98 1,599 0 0 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1993 13–20 39.4% #92 1,599 0 0 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1994 0–1 0.0% #256 1,583 0 0 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1995 4–7 36.4% #133 1,550 0 0 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1996 4–5 44.4% #153 1,562 0 0 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7