H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Claudia Porwik vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 1-3
Meredith Mcgrath holds a 3–1 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Meredith Mcgrath leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Meredith Mcgrath won the 1993 Montpellier fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1993* | Montpellier | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Meredith Mcgrath | 6-4 6-1 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
| Sep 30, 1993* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Meredith Mcgrath | 6-2 6-2 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
| Apr 22, 1993* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Meredith Mcgrath | 7-6 4-6 6-1 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1989* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Claudia Porwik | 6-4 6-2 | Meredith Mcgrath | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Meredith Mcgrath | #315 | #18 | 898 | 1,927 | 90 | 84 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Porwik | Meredith Mcgrath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #780 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #62 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #26 | 1,917 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |