H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Claudia Porwik vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 1-3

Meredith Mcgrath holds a 3–1 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Meredith Mcgrath leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Meredith Mcgrath won the 1993 Montpellier round of 16 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Porwik
GER Age 57
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Meredith Mcgrath
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meredith Mcgrath #72 6-4 6-1 Claudia Porwik #98 Match data Oct 15, 1993* R16 Montpellier Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Meredith Mcgrath #73 6-2 6-2 Claudia Porwik #86 Match data Sep 30, 1993* R32 Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Meredith Mcgrath #184 7-6 4-6 6-1 Claudia Porwik #109 Match data Apr 22, 1993* R32 Kuala Lumpur Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Claudia Porwik #148 6-4 6-2 Meredith Mcgrath #115 Match data Mar 2, 1989* R32 Oklahoma WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudia Porwik #579 #29 148 1,786 114 146 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meredith Mcgrath #315 #18 898 1,927 90 84 51.7% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Porwik Meredith Mcgrath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 6–5 54.5% #96 1,577 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #400 1,497 0 0
18 1987 13–19 40.6% #104 1,581 0 0 1989 6–10 37.5% #93 1,516 0 0
19 1988 11–16 40.7% #68 1,571 0 0 1990 15–12 55.6% #28 1,708 0 0
20 1989 19–18 51.4% #75 1,660 0 0 1991 4–6 40.0% #164 1,679 0 0
21 1990 18–17 51.4% #29 1,667 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #780 1,657 0 0
22 1991 14–20 41.2% #80 1,644 0 0 1993 12–12 50.0% #66 1,707 0 0
23 1992 12–18 40.0% #98 1,605 0 0 1994 22–16 57.9% #39 1,767 0 2
24 1993 13–20 39.4% #92 1,601 0 0 1995 11–15 42.3% #62 1,742 0 2
25 1994 0–1 0.0% #256 1,585 0 0 1996 19–9 67.9% #26 1,917 0 3
26 1995 4–7 36.4% #133 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1996 4–5 44.4% #153 1,563 0 0 1998 1–2 33.3% #318 1,895 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudia Porwik Meredith Mcgrath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1987 4 7 11 36.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1989 15 13 28 53.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1990 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1992 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1995 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 83 156 46.8% 13 21 34 38.2% 11 20 31 35.5% 17 22 39 43.6% — 36 43 79 45.6% 8 11 19 42.1% 29 15 44 65.9% 17 15 32 53.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudia Porwik Meredith Mcgrath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1577 117.2 — — — — +14 +33 — 50.0% -0.42 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +0.65 1988 1497 107.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
18 1987 1582 120.5 — — — — -4 +32 -42 44.7% -0.46 4–8 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 97.8 +1.43 1989 1517 113.0 — — — — +50 — +23 34.4% -0.91 1–1 0–1 — +0.67
19 1988 1572 125.4 — — — — +20 -30 +14 41.4% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 103.4 +0.38 1990 1709 138.3 — — — — +2 — -93 54.1% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 104.9 -0.50
20 1989 1661 127.0 — — — — 0 -72 — 52.9% +0.09 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.85 1991 1679 124.7 — — — — +46 — — 44.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.42
21 1990 1667 133.5 — — — — +11 — — 52.5% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +1.00 1992 1658 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08
22 1991 1645 123.9 — — — — +28 -98 — 42.7% -0.60 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -1.33 1993 1708 131.5 — — — — -20 — -17 49.1% +0.04 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 100.0 -0.63
23 1992 1606 119.1 — — — — +1 — -25 43.3% -0.63 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.85 1994 1768 146.2 — — — — -39 -242 +61 52.9% +0.14 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 110.7 -2.14
24 1993 1601 124.1 — — — — -13 -41 +10 42.3% -0.62 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.9 -0.38 1995 1742 142.5 — — — — +5 -174 — 49.1% +0.21 1–6 (14%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.72
25 1994 1585 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.19 1996 1917 143.6 — — — — -150 -312 +118 63.9% +0.89 6–1 (86%) 1–2 (33%) 105.3 -1.70
26 1995 1551 111.6 — — — — +11 — — 44.4% +0.07 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 95.2 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 1564 110.4 — — — — +28 — — 55.0% +0.25 1–3 (25%) — — +0.74 1998 1895 99.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.03
Career — 1787 129.2 — — — — +7 -22 -6 46.3% -0.33 31–46 (40%) 30–23 (57%) 98.7 +2.04 — 1928 144.8 — — — — -13 -243 +39 51.0% +0.12 28–22 (56%) 13–21 (38%) 105.1 -2.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.