H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Claudia Porwik vs Nana Smith H2H: 0-1

Nana Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nana Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1995 Jakarta round of 16 6-1 0-6 6-1.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nana Smith #57 6-1 0-6 6-1 Claudia Porwik Match data Jan 6, 1995* R16 Jakarta Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudia Porwik #579 #29 148 1,786 114 146 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Porwik Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 6–5 54.5% #96 1,577 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1987 13–19 40.6% #104 1,581 0 0 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1988 11–16 40.7% #68 1,571 0 0 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1989 19–18 51.4% #75 1,660 0 0 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1990 18–17 51.4% #29 1,667 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1991 14–20 41.2% #80 1,644 0 0 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1992 12–18 40.0% #98 1,605 0 0 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1993 13–20 39.4% #92 1,601 0 0 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1994 0–1 0.0% #256 1,585 0 0 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 1995 4–7 36.4% #133 1,551 0 0 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 1996 4–5 44.4% #153 1,563 0 0 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudia Porwik Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1987 4 7 11 36.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1989 15 13 28 53.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1990 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1991 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 0 9 9 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1992 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1995 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1995 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1996 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1999 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 73 83 156 46.8% 13 21 34 38.2% 11 20 31 35.5% 17 22 39 43.6% 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudia Porwik Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1577 117.2 +14 +33 50.0% -0.42 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +0.65 1988 1496 102.5 0.0% -3.50 -0.11
18 1987 1582 120.5 -4 +32 -42 44.7% -0.46 4–8 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 97.8 +1.43 1989 1588 139.3 +6 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1988 1572 125.4 +20 -30 +14 41.4% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 103.4 +0.38 1990 1541 113.3 +33 -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1989 1661 127.0 0 -72 52.9% +0.09 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.85 1991 1529 118.1 +48 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 +0.61
21 1990 1667 133.5 +11 52.5% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +1.00 1992 1557 108.5 +41 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) +0.97
22 1991 1645 123.9 +28 -98 42.7% -0.60 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -1.33 1993 1444 90.0 +16 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1992 1606 119.1 +1 -25 43.3% -0.63 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.85 1994 1579 128.2 -1 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) +0.70
24 1993 1601 124.1 -13 -41 +10 42.3% -0.62 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.9 -0.38 1995 1545 112.9 0 -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1994 1585 97.9 0.0% -3.50 +0.19 1996 1602 121.7 +24 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 1995 1551 111.6 +11 44.4% +0.07 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 95.2 -0.10 1997 1543 108.6 +33 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 1996 1564 110.4 +28 55.0% +0.25 1–3 (25%) +0.74 1998 1538 116.7 +45 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 -0.13
28 1999 1522 112.5 +37 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 -0.63
29 2000 1499 99.7 20.0% -2.60 0–1 -0.03
Career 1787 129.2 +7 -22 -6 46.3% -0.33 31–46 (40%) 30–23 (57%) 98.7 +2.04 1650 124.0 +23 -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.