H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Claudia Porwik vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-0

Claudia Porwik holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1992 Essen round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Porwik
GER Age 57
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Claudia Porwik #81 7-5 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #123 Match data Feb 6, 1992* R32 Essen Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudia Porwik #579 #29 148 1,786 114 146 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Porwik Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1986 6–5 54.5% #96 1,577 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1987 13–19 40.6% #104 1,581 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1988 11–16 40.7% #68 1,571 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1989 19–18 51.4% #75 1,660 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1990 18–17 51.4% #29 1,667 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1991 14–20 41.2% #80 1,644 0 0 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1992 12–18 40.0% #98 1,605 0 0 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1993 13–20 39.4% #92 1,601 0 0 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1994 0–1 0.0% #256 1,585 0 0 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1995 4–7 36.4% #133 1,551 0 0 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1996 4–5 44.4% #153 1,563 0 0 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudia Porwik Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1987 4 7 11 36.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1989 15 13 28 53.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1990 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1991 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1992 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1995 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1996 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 83 156 46.8% 13 21 34 38.2% 11 20 31 35.5% 17 22 39 43.6% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudia Porwik Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1986 1577 117.2 — — — — +14 +33 — 50.0% -0.42 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +0.65 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1987 1582 120.5 — — — — -4 +32 -42 44.7% -0.46 4–8 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 97.8 +1.43 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1988 1572 125.4 — — — — +20 -30 +14 41.4% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 103.4 +0.38 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1989 1661 127.0 — — — — 0 -72 — 52.9% +0.09 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.85 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1990 1667 133.5 — — — — +11 — — 52.5% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +1.00 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1991 1645 123.9 — — — — +28 -98 — 42.7% -0.60 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -1.33 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1992 1606 119.1 — — — — +1 — -25 43.3% -0.63 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.85 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1993 1601 124.1 — — — — -13 -41 +10 42.3% -0.62 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.9 -0.38 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1994 1585 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.19 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1995 1551 111.6 — — — — +11 — — 44.4% +0.07 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 95.2 -0.10 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1996 1564 110.4 — — — — +28 — — 55.0% +0.25 1–3 (25%) — — +0.74 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 1787 129.2 — — — — +7 -22 -6 46.3% -0.33 31–46 (40%) 30–23 (57%) 98.7 +2.04 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.