H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Claudia Porwik vs Nicole Arendt H2H: 0-1
Nicole Arendt holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Arendt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Arendt won the 1996 Wimbledon second round 2-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Nicole Arendt | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Arendt | #433 | #49 | 487 | 1,776 | 67 | 75 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Porwik | Nicole Arendt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #73 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #143 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |