H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Claudia Porwik vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 0-1
Nicole Jagerman holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Jagerman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Jagerman won the 1993 Brisbane second round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1993* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Nicole Jagerman | 6-1 7-5 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Porwik | Nicole Jagerman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |