H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Claudia Porwik vs Petra Langrova H2H: 2-1
Claudia Porwik holds a 2–1 lead over Petra Langrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1992 Linz fourth round 4-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1992* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Claudia Porwik | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
| Jan 3, 1991* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Claudia Porwik | 2-6 7-6 6-4 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
| Jan 3, 1990* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Petra Langrova | 7-6 6-4 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Porwik | Petra Langrova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |