H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Claudia Porwik vs Silke Meier H2H: 1-1
Claudia Porwik and Silke Meier are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on carpet, while Silke Meier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1992 Cesena third round 6-2 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 1992* | Cesena | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Claudia Porwik | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | Silke Meier | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Silke Meier | 6-4 2-6 5-2 (ret.) | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Porwik | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |