Coco Gauff
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 3 | 11 | 14 | May 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6 | 7 | 13 | Mar 28, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 6 | 5 | 11 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 5 | 5 | 10 | Aug 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Paula Badosa | 4 | 5 | 9 | Sep 3, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Barbora Krejcikova H2H: 0-2
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 2–0 lead over Coco Gauff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2024 WTA Finals round robin 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | 7-5 6-4 | Coco Gauff | Match data | Nov 4, 2024 | RR | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | Hard |
| Barbora Krejcikova | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Coco Gauff | Match data | Jun 9, 2021* | QF | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,176 | 285 | 113 | 71.6% | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 |
| Barbora Krejcikova | #29 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,012 | 175 | 106 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,119 | 1 | 9 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,100 | 2 | 11 | 2017 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #126 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 2,159 | 2 | 12 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #5 | 1,942 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,909 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,906 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #10 | 1,896 | 2 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,868 | 2 | 9 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2019 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 23 | 16 | 39 | 59.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 40 | 9 | 49 | 81.6% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 35 | 10 | 45 | 77.8% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2016 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2025 | 25 | 11 | 36 | 69.4% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2026 | 28 | 7 | 35 | 80.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2018 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22 | 10 | 32 | 68.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| Career | — | 182 | 73 | 255 | 71.4% | 77 | 26 | 103 | 74.8% | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | — | 108 | 64 | 172 | 62.8% | 39 | 30 | 69 | 56.5% | 28 | 12 | 40 | 70.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/399 of Coco Gauff's and 264/281 of Barbora Krejcikova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2019 | 16/16 | 2.8 | 4.8 | 65.0% | 63.7% | 42.2% | 52.0% | 54.1% | 56.1% | 42.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 18/18 | 3.1 | 8.3 | 61.0% | 69.1% | 42.3% | 46.5% | 55.8% | 58.6% | 41.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 49/51 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 60.9% | 69.1% | 47.5% | 55.5% | 44.3% | 60.6% | 44.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 58/60 | 4.1 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 67.1% | 45.3% | 57.8% | 49.0% | 59.2% | 45.2% | 2014 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 69.1% | 64.0% | 38.7% | 62.3% | 62.5% | 56.4% | 47.6% |
| 19 | 2023 | 66/67 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 60.1% | 68.8% | 48.2% | 56.6% | 51.7% | 60.7% | 46.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 68/71 | 3.6 | 6.1 | 58.4% | 73.6% | 45.5% | 56.7% | 52.8% | 62.1% | 49.7% | 2016 | 7/7 | 2.4 | 4.3 | 60.3% | 65.0% | 42.6% | 61.7% | 46.6% | 55.6% | 42.1% |
| 21 | 2025 | 54/60 | 2.7 | 6.9 | 62.4% | 67.8% | 45.3% | 49.7% | 57.7% | 59.4% | 49.6% | 2017 | 9/11 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 60.2% | 64.5% | 41.8% | 58.0% | 36.3% | 55.4% | 46.9% |
| 22 | 2026 | 51/56 | 3.1 | 4.9 | 63.3% | 68.3% | 44.1% | 49.5% | 48.2% | 59.5% | 48.1% | 2018 | 4/4 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 49.7% | 60.1% | 43.0% | 45.7% | 42.1% | 51.0% | 45.4% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 77.5% | 60.2% | 47.2% | 68.5% | 55.0% | 57.4% | 48.5% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14/14 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 63.9% | 67.2% | 41.3% | 52.9% | 43.0% | 57.9% | 45.1% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 57/60 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 59.1% | 70.1% | 50.2% | 60.5% | 50.6% | 62.0% | 45.0% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 40/41 | 3.6 | 4.7 | 59.9% | 70.3% | 47.5% | 57.0% | 51.0% | 61.1% | 45.0% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 48/50 | 3.4 | 4.1 | 59.8% | 69.9% | 46.8% | 52.2% | 50.9% | 60.6% | 44.3% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 32/37 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 63.0% | 68.6% | 45.2% | 55.9% | 47.8% | 60.1% | 42.5% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 22/23 | 3.2 | 5.5 | 59.6% | 67.2% | 44.4% | 53.5% | 53.0% | 58.0% | 44.1% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 26/29 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 61.8% | 69.2% | 47.1% | 57.0% | 47.2% | 60.8% | 44.3% |
| Career | — | 380/399 | 3.7 | 5.4 | 61.4% | 69.0% | 45.7% | 54.1% | 51.2% | 60.1% | 46.8% | — | 264/282 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 60.6% | 68.8% | 46.6% | 56.4% | 49.3% | 60.0% | 44.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2019 | 1694 | 127.4 | -0.40 | -1.45 | 0.957 | 49.2% | -25 | — | +15 | 57.1% | -0.11 | 5–0 (100%) | 3–0 (100%) | 110.5 | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 1782 | 144.9 | +0.78 | +0.22 | 1.007 | 50.4% | -13 | -207 | — | 57.8% | +0.27 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.2 | -1.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 1898 | 145.4 | +3.52 | +2.26 | 1.130 | 52.5% | -104 | +9 | -86 | 60.2% | +0.65 | 13–6 (68%) | 10–7 (59%) | 108.1 | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 1927 | 158.3 | +2.88 | +2.90 | 1.106 | 52.0% | -48 | +73 | -46 | 62.5% | +0.84 | 6–4 (60%) | 10–6 (63%) | 103.4 | -1.68 | 2014 | 1504 | 102.8 | -0.26 | +0.43 | 1.090 | 52.0% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.60 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 |
| 19 | 2023 | 2107 | 166.1 | +4.50 | +4.45 | 1.173 | 53.4% | +40 | -131 | -245 | 70.9% | +1.39 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–1 (89%) | 106.9 | -0.71 | 2015 | 1489 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 |
| 20 | 2024 | 2120 | 167.7 | +4.83 | +6.58 | 1.311 | 55.6% | +53 | -73 | -151 | 70.9% | +1.78 | 12–8 (60%) | 9–7 (56%) | 99.0 | +0.77 | 2016 | 1508 | 114.5 | +0.66 | +0.02 | 0.949 | 49.1% | +26 | +26 | — | 38.9% | -0.67 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | -0.80 |
| 21 | 2025 | 2101 | 167.3 | +2.64 | +6.44 | 1.221 | 54.4% | +20 | +119 | — | 66.9% | +1.29 | 12–3 (80%) | 10–6 (63%) | 106.5 | +0.39 | 2017 | 1558 | 115.8 | +0.48 | +1.29 | 1.052 | 51.1% | — | +109 | — | 42.9% | -0.48 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–0 | — | -0.18 |
| 22 | 2026 | 2159 | 167.0 | +3.17 | +5.97 | 1.186 | 53.6% | +51 | +13 | -195 | 68.6% | +1.34 | 17–10 (63%) | 8–4 (67%) | 105.5 | -0.08 | 2018 | 1541 | 112.6 | -2.26 | +1.26 | 0.925 | 48.1% | -31 | — | — | 14.3% | -1.14 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1543 | 98.3 | -0.20 | +0.69 | 1.139 | 53.5% | — | +55 | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.30 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1699 | 133.2 | +1.74 | +1.17 | 1.071 | 51.2% | -60 | -21 | — | 59.5% | +0.38 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–0 | — | +0.28 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1943 | 158.1 | +4.93 | +2.86 | 1.184 | 53.4% | -68 | +45 | -256 | 66.2% | +1.44 | 13–4 (76%) | 7–6 (54%) | 111.8 | -0.54 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1910 | 149.3 | +3.27 | +2.35 | 1.156 | 52.8% | +41 | -10 | -231 | 61.5% | +0.80 | 5–6 (45%) | 8–5 (62%) | 99.8 | +0.24 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1906 | 157.8 | +4.11 | +1.82 | 1.123 | 52.4% | +66 | -62 | -137 | 61.0% | +1.00 | 7–4 (64%) | 3–7 (30%) | 99.6 | +0.43 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1897 | 140.8 | +3.38 | -0.19 | 1.064 | 51.2% | +6 | -118 | +120 | 54.2% | +0.13 | 8–7 (53%) | 10–2 (83%) | 105.2 | -0.11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1896 | 140.8 | +1.40 | +1.11 | 1.050 | 50.8% | +38 | -153 | +91 | 53.6% | +0.25 | 8–2 (80%) | 3–0 (100%) | 108.5 | +0.17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1869 | 138.1 | +2.45 | +1.26 | 1.132 | 52.5% | +6 | -84 | +149 | 63.9% | +1.07 | 2–5 (29%) | 4–6 (40%) | 93.9 | +0.18 |
| Career | — | 2176 | 166.5 | +3.36 | +4.35 | 1.171 | 53.3% | +7 | +2 | -129 | 66.2% | +1.15 | 79–42 (65%) | 61–33 (65%) | 113.8 | -0.55 | — | 2013 | 150.8 | +3.16 | +1.63 | 1.113 | 52.2% | +8 | -2 | +7 | 58.7% | +0.70 | 52–40 (57%) | 38–27 (58%) | 109.0 | +0.11 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Barbora Krejcikova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 26, 2025 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 11, 2024 | H2H |
| Liudmila Samsonova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |