H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Caroline Garcia H2H: 2-3
Caroline Garcia holds a 3–2 lead over Coco Gauff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Caroline Garcia leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2024 Miami fourth round 6-3 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2024* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2022 | Fort Worth Finals | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 6-4 6-3 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
| Sep 8, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 6-3 6-4 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2022* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-2 7-6(3) | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-3 6-7(2) 6-1 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Caroline Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |