Coco Gauff
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 3 | 11 | 14 | May 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6 | 7 | 13 | Mar 28, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 6 | 5 | 11 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 5 | 5 | 10 | Aug 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Paula Badosa | 4 | 5 | 9 | Sep 3, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Coco Gauff holds a 1–0 lead over Lauren Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2021 Charleston Open third round 6-2 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | 6-2 7-6(2) | Lauren Davis | Match data | Apr 9, 2021* | R16 | Charleston Open | WTA 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,176 | 285 | 113 | 71.6% | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 |
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,837 | 143 | 182 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,119 | 1 | 9 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,100 | 2 | 11 | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 2,159 | 2 | 12 | 2016 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2019 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2011 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 23 | 16 | 39 | 59.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2012 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 40 | 9 | 49 | 81.6% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2013 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 20 | 2024 | 35 | 10 | 45 | 77.8% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2014 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 21 | 2025 | 25 | 11 | 36 | 69.4% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2015 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 22 | 2026 | 28 | 7 | 35 | 80.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2016 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 182 | 73 | 255 | 71.4% | 77 | 26 | 103 | 74.8% | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | — | 97 | 113 | 210 | 46.2% | 25 | 41 | 66 | 37.9% | 21 | 28 | 49 | 42.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/399 of Coco Gauff's and 304/325 of Lauren Davis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2019 | 16/16 | 2.8 | 4.8 | 65.0% | 63.7% | 42.2% | 52.0% | 54.1% | 56.1% | 42.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 18/18 | 3.1 | 8.3 | 61.0% | 69.1% | 42.3% | 46.5% | 55.8% | 58.6% | 41.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 49/51 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 60.9% | 69.1% | 47.5% | 55.5% | 44.3% | 60.6% | 44.5% | 2011 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 49.5% | 55.1% | 40.4% | 46.3% | 16.7% | 47.3% | 23.6% |
| 18 | 2022 | 58/60 | 4.1 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 67.1% | 45.3% | 57.8% | 49.0% | 59.2% | 45.2% | 2012 | 10/10 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 66.5% | 59.2% | 48.6% | 48.5% | 36.9% | 55.6% | 42.9% |
| 19 | 2023 | 66/67 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 60.1% | 68.8% | 48.2% | 56.6% | 51.7% | 60.7% | 46.1% | 2013 | 23/30 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 62.6% | 56.8% | 42.6% | 49.6% | 41.8% | 51.6% | 39.9% |
| 20 | 2024 | 68/71 | 3.6 | 6.1 | 58.4% | 73.6% | 45.5% | 56.7% | 52.8% | 62.1% | 49.7% | 2014 | 38/41 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 63.1% | 60.7% | 42.4% | 47.5% | 42.8% | 54.0% | 42.8% |
| 21 | 2025 | 54/60 | 2.7 | 6.9 | 62.4% | 67.8% | 45.3% | 49.7% | 57.7% | 59.4% | 49.6% | 2015 | 29/34 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 64.0% | 63.0% | 46.0% | 43.8% | 54.2% | 56.8% | 40.7% |
| 22 | 2026 | 51/56 | 3.1 | 4.9 | 63.3% | 68.3% | 44.1% | 49.5% | 48.2% | 59.5% | 48.1% | 2016 | 19/24 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 59.7% | 62.9% | 44.5% | 51.5% | 50.5% | 55.7% | 45.3% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 41/42 | 1.4 | 5.6 | 60.5% | 59.3% | 40.8% | 50.4% | 56.0% | 52.1% | 47.6% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8/8 | 1.5 | 6.3 | 59.3% | 57.6% | 37.5% | 54.0% | 48.6% | 49.5% | 41.6% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 21/21 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 61.4% | 60.2% | 48.6% | 60.3% | 50.7% | 55.7% | 41.3% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14/14 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 66.5% | 57.2% | 45.3% | 49.9% | 52.1% | 53.2% | 43.2% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 28/28 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 55.3% | 63.8% | 44.5% | 46.1% | 45.0% | 55.1% | 42.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 30/30 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 56.8% | 64.4% | 42.8% | 50.4% | 50.5% | 54.9% | 42.7% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 30/30 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 61.1% | 61.0% | 45.3% | 48.1% | 52.8% | 54.9% | 42.8% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5/5 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 56.6% | 48.9% | 39.4% | 44.0% | 51.9% | 43.5% | 35.7% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 5/5 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 57.8% | 48.9% | 44.0% | 47.2% | 43.9% | 47.3% | 41.8% |
| Career | — | 380/399 | 3.7 | 5.4 | 61.4% | 69.0% | 45.7% | 54.1% | 51.2% | 60.1% | 46.8% | — | 304/325 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 60.8% | 60.5% | 43.8% | 49.3% | 48.9% | 53.9% | 42.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2019 | 1694 | 127.4 | -0.40 | -1.45 | 0.957 | 49.2% | -25 | — | +15 | 57.1% | -0.11 | 5–0 (100%) | 3–0 (100%) | 110.5 | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 1782 | 144.9 | +0.78 | +0.22 | 1.007 | 50.4% | -13 | -207 | — | 57.8% | +0.27 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.2 | -1.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 1898 | 145.4 | +3.52 | +2.26 | 1.130 | 52.5% | -104 | +9 | -86 | 60.2% | +0.65 | 13–6 (68%) | 10–7 (59%) | 108.1 | +0.08 | 2011 | 1469 | 96.1 | -1.99 | -3.92 | 0.448 | 35.8% | +25 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.83 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 18 | 2022 | 1927 | 158.3 | +2.88 | +2.90 | 1.106 | 52.0% | -48 | +73 | -46 | 62.5% | +0.84 | 6–4 (60%) | 10–6 (63%) | 103.4 | -1.68 | 2012 | 1497 | 108.5 | -1.41 | -0.02 | 0.967 | 49.1% | +2 | +46 | — | 42.9% | -0.10 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.28 |
| 19 | 2023 | 2107 | 166.1 | +4.50 | +4.45 | 1.173 | 53.4% | +40 | -131 | -245 | 70.9% | +1.39 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–1 (89%) | 106.9 | -0.71 | 2013 | 1576 | 111.7 | -3.39 | -2.88 | 0.824 | 45.7% | +11 | -54 | -36 | 40.6% | -1.01 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–2 (75%) | 108.1 | -0.03 |
| 20 | 2024 | 2120 | 167.7 | +4.83 | +6.58 | 1.311 | 55.6% | +53 | -73 | -151 | 70.9% | +1.78 | 12–8 (60%) | 9–7 (56%) | 99.0 | +0.77 | 2014 | 1654 | 126.2 | -1.49 | -0.23 | 0.930 | 48.3% | -1 | -154 | +33 | 51.1% | -0.11 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–1 (83%) | 105.7 | +0.07 |
| 21 | 2025 | 2101 | 167.3 | +2.64 | +6.44 | 1.221 | 54.4% | +20 | +119 | — | 66.9% | +1.29 | 12–3 (80%) | 10–6 (63%) | 106.5 | +0.39 | 2015 | 1580 | 117.4 | -0.82 | -0.57 | 0.941 | 48.6% | -2 | -59 | +76 | 36.0% | -1.15 | 6–5 (55%) | 7–4 (64%) | 103.8 | -1.82 |
| 22 | 2026 | 2159 | 167.0 | +3.18 | +5.97 | 1.186 | 53.6% | +51 | +13 | -195 | 68.6% | +1.34 | 17–10 (63%) | 8–4 (67%) | 105.5 | -0.08 | 2016 | 1699 | 128.3 | -1.36 | +1.29 | 1.023 | 50.4% | +49 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.29 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.7 | -0.31 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1624 | 128.1 | -3.03 | +3.62 | 0.995 | 50.0% | +63 | -69 | -64 | 47.4% | -0.11 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–3 (57%) | 99.9 | +0.39 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1603 | 108.4 | -2.94 | -0.71 | 0.824 | 45.7% | +42 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.10 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1734 | 133.2 | -0.71 | -1.22 | 0.932 | 48.8% | -2 | -166 | -55 | 43.2% | -0.39 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–2 (33%) | 103.3 | -0.90 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1623 | 118.4 | -2.04 | -0.34 | 0.923 | 48.3% | +39 | — | — | 40.6% | -0.75 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.2 | -0.17 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1646 | 122.0 | -1.24 | -0.82 | 0.936 | 48.4% | -3 | -115 | +89 | 42.6% | -0.66 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–3 (25%) | 101.0 | -0.59 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1715 | 129.3 | -1.29 | -0.08 | 0.947 | 48.7% | -7 | -84 | -9 | 42.4% | -0.62 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | 99.0 | -1.24 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1682 | 126.0 | -1.26 | -0.82 | 0.950 | 48.9% | +20 | -11 | -71 | 50.7% | -0.24 | 5–8 (38%) | 6–0 (100%) | 100.9 | -0.58 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1625 | 96.9 | -3.79 | -3.39 | 0.631 | 39.9% | — | — | — | 9.1% | -3.18 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.30 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1593 | 110.2 | -1.83 | -2.46 | 0.794 | 44.6% | +38 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 2–0 | — | — | 0.00 |
| Career | — | 2176 | 166.5 | +3.36 | +4.35 | 1.171 | 53.3% | +7 | +2 | -129 | 66.2% | +1.15 | 79–42 (65%) | 61–33 (65%) | 113.8 | -0.55 | — | 1838 | 128.2 | -1.76 | -0.15 | 0.925 | 48.3% | +20 | -77 | +9 | 43.9% | -0.54 | 53–48 (52%) | 39–29 (57%) | 108.1 | -1.56 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 3 | 11 | 14 | May 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6 | 7 | 13 | Mar 28, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 6 | 5 | 11 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 5 | 5 | 10 | Aug 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Paula Badosa | 4 | 5 | 9 | Sep 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sloane Stephens | 3 | 3 | 6 | Aug 23, 2023 | H2H |
| Danka Kovinic | 3 | 2 | 5 | Aug 30, 2023 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 26, 2023 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 19, 2022 | H2H |
| Madison Keys | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 23, 2022 | H2H |