H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Coco Gauff vs Tatjana Maria H2H: 2-0

Coco Gauff holds a 2–0 lead over Tatjana Maria in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2024 US Open second round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Gauff
United States Age 22 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Tatjana Maria
Germany Age 39 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Gauff #3 6-4 6-0 Tatjana Maria #99 Match data Aug 29, 2024* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Coco Gauff #7 6-4 6-1 Tatjana Maria #68 Match data Jan 5, 2023* R32 ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Gauff #5 #2 8,173 2,176 287 114 71.6% 2 4 1 1 4 12
Tatjana Maria #70 #36 1,320 1,822 164 262 38.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Gauff Tatjana Maria
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2019 11–5 68.8% #68 1,693 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 2020 10–8 55.6% #48 1,782 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 2021 35–16 68.6% #22 1,897 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 2022 38–22 63.3% #7 1,927 0 2 2006 0–2 0.0% #136 1,481 0 0
19 2023 51–16 76.1% #3 2,107 1 6 2007 4–11 26.7% #89 1,447 0 0
20 2024 54–17 76.1% #3 2,119 1 9 2008 1–7 12.5% #223 1,420 0 0
21 2025 43–16 72.9% #3 2,101 2 11 2009 6–9 40.0% #71 1,491 0 0
22 2026 45–14 76.3% #5 2,137 2 12 2010 8–16 33.3% #137 1,496 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2011 0–2 0.0% #203 1,468 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2012 2–3 40.0% #112 1,473 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2013 1–6 14.3% #268 1,437 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2014 2–3 40.0% #160 1,446 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2015 10–16 38.5% #74 1,478 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 4–15 21.1% #115 1,466 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2017 14–17 45.2% #47 1,565 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 12–23 34.3% #72 1,632 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2019 12–20 37.5% #86 1,577 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2020 2–5 28.6% #109 1,586 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2022 17–11 60.7% #68 1,653 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2023 24–25 49.0% #54 1,704 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2024 13–27 32.5% #86 1,576 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2025 14–19 42.4% #45 1,637 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2026 18–25 41.9% #70 1,795 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Gauff Tatjana Maria
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2019 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2020 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2021 15 10 25 60.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2022 23 16 39 59.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2023 40 9 49 81.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2024 35 10 45 77.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2025 25 11 36 69.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2026 30 8 38 78.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 6 9 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 7 9 16 43.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 4 17 21 19.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 14 16 30 46.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 7 13 20 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 4 14 18 22.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7%
Career — 184 74 258 71.3% 77 26 103 74.8% 26 14 40 65.0% — 76 153 229 33.2% 52 79 131 39.7% 36 30 66 54.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Gauff Tatjana Maria
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2019 1694 127.4 -0.40 -1.45 0.957 49.2% -25 — +15 57.1% -0.11 5–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 110.5 +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2020 1782 144.9 +0.78 +0.22 1.007 50.4% -13 -207 — 57.8% +0.27 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2021 1898 145.4 +3.52 +2.26 1.130 52.5% -104 +10 -86 60.2% +0.65 13–6 (68%) 10–7 (59%) 108.1 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2022 1927 158.3 +2.88 +2.90 1.106 52.0% -48 +74 -46 62.5% +0.84 6–4 (60%) 10–6 (63%) 103.4 -1.68 2006 1481 99.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16
19 2023 2107 166.1 +4.50 +4.45 1.173 53.4% +40 -133 -245 70.9% +1.39 11–5 (69%) 8–1 (89%) 106.9 -0.71 2007 1448 107.7 — — — — +9 +71 +139 26.7% -1.40 0–2 — — -0.09
20 2024 2120 167.7 +4.83 +6.58 1.311 55.6% +53 -73 -151 70.9% +1.78 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 99.0 +0.77 2008 1420 111.5 — — — — +28 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 0–1 — -0.48
21 2025 2101 167.3 +2.65 +6.44 1.221 54.4% +19 +119 — 66.9% +1.29 12–3 (80%) 10–6 (63%) 106.5 +0.40 2009 1491 111.6 — — — — -29 +37 — 36.4% -1.18 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.55
22 2026 2138 167.0 +3.05 +5.70 1.177 53.5% +47 +28 -179 69.0% +1.37 18–10 (64%) 9–4 (69%) 106.4 -0.18 2010 1497 109.6 — — — — -13 0 — 35.7% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.3 -0.85
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1469 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.16
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1473 101.7 — — — — -17 — — 41.7% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.36
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1438 94.6 -2.28 -2.31 0.593 40.1% +19 +16 — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.01
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1447 95.9 -2.52 -1.88 0.844 46.7% +19 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.29
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1479 110.8 +0.60 -1.33 0.980 49.7% -8 -42 +112 43.1% -0.31 1–5 (17%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 +0.67
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1466 109.7 -1.11 -3.07 0.839 46.4% -10 -23 — 24.4% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 +0.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1566 124.1 +1.13 -0.63 1.024 51.0% -48 -14 -21 46.0% -0.06 0–5 (0%) 1–0 — +0.89
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1633 116.0 -1.90 -3.62 0.840 46.7% -70 -112 +74 35.8% -1.16 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 104.4 -0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1578 121.2 -1.61 -2.85 0.849 46.9% +26 -142 +163 42.3% -0.79 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.1 -0.64
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1587 109.8 -3.38 -1.03 0.757 43.7% +15 — — 25.0% -2.19 2–0 1–1 — -0.80
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1511 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1653 127.0 +2.42 +0.72 1.120 52.4% -89 -82 +219 60.0% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 103.4 +1.07
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1705 130.4 +0.14 +0.47 1.013 50.4% -13 -95 +119 50.0% +0.10 6–10 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +1.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1577 112.0 -3.26 -2.66 0.853 46.5% +20 -41 +206 33.0% -1.51 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 97.1 +1.34
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1637 120.9 -2.97 -1.00 0.857 46.5% -64 -153 +316 44.7% -0.55 4–6 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 99.5 +0.79
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1796 130.7 +0.59 -0.27 1.007 50.2% -239 -190 +304 44.6% -0.25 1–7 (13%) 4–4 (50%) 96.5 +0.06
Career — 2177 166.5 +3.34 +4.32 1.170 53.3% +7 +4 -126 66.3% +1.16 80–42 (66%) 62–33 (65%) 114.1 -0.57 — 1822 122.7 -0.63 -1.33 0.932 48.7% -38 -59 +190 40.4% -0.69 44–70 (39%) 45–49 (48%) 97.5 +0.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.