H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Timea Babos H2H: 1-0
Coco Gauff holds a 1–0 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2019 US Open second round 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 33
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Timea Babos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Timea Babos | #453 | #25 | 1,675 | 1,768 | 123 | 177 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Timea Babos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2012 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #88 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2014 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #99 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2015 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #89 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,497 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,480 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,451 | 0 | 3 |