H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Coco Gauff vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-0

Coco Gauff holds a 2–0 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2020 Australian Open first round 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Gauff
USA Age 22 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 22, 2020* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Coco Gauff #67 7-6(5) 6-3 Venus Williams #55 Match data
Jul 3, 2019* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Coco Gauff #313 6-4 6-4 Venus Williams #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Coco Gauff #4 #2 8,173 2,158 268 110 70.9% 2 3 1 2 3 11
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Gauff Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 2019 11–5 68.8% #68 1,693 0 1 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2020 10–8 55.6% #48 1,781 0 1 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2021 35–16 68.6% #22 1,903 0 2 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2022 38–22 63.3% #7 1,925 0 2 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2023 51–16 76.1% #3 2,107 1 6 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2024 52–16 76.5% #3 2,125 1 9 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2025 43–16 72.9% #3 2,102 2 11 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2026 28–11 71.8% #4 2,092 2 11 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 — — — — — — — 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 — — — — — — — 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 — — — — — — — 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 — — — — — — — 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 — — — — — — — 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 — — — — — — — 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 — — — — — — — 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47