H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Anke Huber H2H: 1-5

Anke Huber holds a 5–1 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2000 Hamburg quarterfinal 6-7(6) 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 2000* Hamburg WTA 500 QF Clay Anke Huber #14 6-7(6) 7-6(4) 6-2 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data
Oct 12, 1996* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Hard Anke Huber #5 6-1 6-3 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data
Jan 26, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Anke Huber #9 4-6 6-2 6-1 Conchita Martínez #2 Match data
Aug 12, 1995* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Conchita Martínez #3 6-1 7-5 Anke Huber #10 Match data
Nov 15, 1993 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals QF Carpet Anke Huber #10 6-3 6-3 Conchita Martínez #4 Match data
Jun 3, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Anke Huber #10 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 Conchita Martínez #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 — — — — — — —
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 — — — — — — —
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 — — — — — — —
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —