H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Ann Grossman H2H: 4-1

Conchita Martínez holds a 4–1 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1996 Roland Garros third round 6-2 6-1.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 2, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Conchita Martínez #2 6-2 6-1 Ann Grossman #70 Match data
Sep 2, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Ann Grossman #45 6-3 2-6 6-4 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data
Aug 29, 1992* San Diego WTA 500 QF Carpet Conchita Martínez #8 6-1 6-3 Ann Grossman #57 Match data
May 31, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Conchita Martínez #8 6-2 6-2 Ann Grossman #52 Match data
Feb 29, 1992* Indian Wells WTA 1000 SF Hard Conchita Martínez #8 6-3 6-1 Ann Grossman #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,888 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,749 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,636 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,734 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,810 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,664 0 0
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33