H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Anne Kremer H2H: 3-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 3–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2000 Canadian Open quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Conchita Martínez #6 6-2 6-4 Anne Kremer #50 Match data Aug 19, 2000* QF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Conchita Martínez #4 6-3 7-6(5) Anne Kremer #34 Match data Jun 28, 2000* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Conchita Martínez #12 5-7 7-5 6-2 Anne Kremer #28 Match data Jan 10, 2000* R32 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7 — — — — — — —
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0
24 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2
28 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2
32 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Conchita Martínez Anne Kremer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4% — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 18/135 of Conchita Martínez's and 41/71 of Anne Kremer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Conchita Martínez Anne Kremer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/18 2.4 1.6 69.3% 58.4% 35.9% 47.0% 58.1% 51.0% 43.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 5/12 0.8 3.0 62.0% 50.4% 41.6% 42.4% 30.3% 47.5% 42.1%
31 2003 10/50 1.5 3.6 58.2% 62.7% 46.9% 50.8% 52.5% 55.9% 49.1% 2007 12/20 1.3 2.7 70.8% 54.9% 43.4% 43.1% 45.8% 51.6% 42.4%
32 2004 4/37 3.0 3.8 57.1% 64.2% 49.7% 52.7% 37.0% 58.0% 42.7% 2008 9/10 1.0 3.8 62.2% 52.5% 39.7% 44.1% 42.5% 47.5% 42.9%
33 2005 4/48 2.3 3.3 60.9% 58.0% 45.4% 59.9% 60.8% 52.9% 44.2% 2009 3/4 0.7 4.7 60.9% 59.4% 32.9% 41.7% 30.0% 49.0% 36.5%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 7/7 1.7 2.6 66.0% 52.0% 38.2% 34.7% 59.6% 47.4% 38.2%
Career — 18/955 2.0 3.6 58.6% 62.0% 47.2% 53.2% 50.9% 55.7% 46.6% — 41/333 1.3 3.0 66.1% 54.1% 39.8% 42.2% 45.9% 49.2% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Conchita Martínez Anne Kremer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -75 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 2076 163.5 — — — — -95 +132 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09
20 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12
21 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53
22 1994 2065 167.5 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65
23 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35
24 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80
25 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14
26 1998 1968 163.0 — — — — -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24
27 1999 1898 159.2 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58
28 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32
29 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09
30 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81
31 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03
32 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27
33 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19
50 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83 — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.