H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 6-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 6–0 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2003 Indian Wells third round 0-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 8, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Conchita Martínez #30 0-6 6-3 6-3 Barbara Rittner #87 Match data
Jan 7, 2000* Gold Coast WTA 500 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #15 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Barbara Rittner #59 Match data
May 2, 1997* Hamburg WTA 250 R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #6 7-5 6-0 Barbara Rittner #41 Match data
Jan 18, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Conchita Martínez #3 6-3 6-2 Barbara Rittner #40 Match data
Oct 29, 1993* Essen WTA 250 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #5 6-3 6-4 Barbara Rittner #31 Match data
Mar 7, 1992* Boca Raton WTA 1000 QF Hard Conchita Martínez #8 6-1 6-0 Barbara Rittner #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,883 209 217 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Barbara Rittner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1992 23–15 60.5% #29 1,829 0 1
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,838 0 1
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,818 0 1
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,728 0 1
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,728 0 1
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,653 0 1
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,664 0 1
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,655 0 1
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,632 0 2
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,568 0 2
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,571 0 2
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —