H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 4-2

Conchita Martínez holds a 4–2 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 2–0 on carpet, while Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1997 Tokyo quarterfinal 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 2, 1997* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #16 6-1 6-0 Conchita Martínez #4 Match data
Nov 13, 1995 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals QF Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #14 7-5 6-2 Conchita Martínez #2 Match data
Sep 7, 1995* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Conchita Martínez #3 3-6 7-6 6-2 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #15 Match data
Mar 11, 1995* Delray Beach WTA 250 SF Hard Conchita Martínez #4 1-0 (ret.) Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #15 Match data
May 29, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Conchita Martínez #3 7-5 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #25 Match data
May 15, 1993* Berlin WTA 1000 QF Clay Conchita Martínez #6 6-1 6-0 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 — — — — — — —
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7