H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 1-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1990 Leipzig quarterfinal 6-3 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 29, 1990* Leipzig WTA 250 QF Carpet Conchita Martínez #10 6-3 2-6 6-1 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Claudia Kohde Kilsch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 — — — — — — —
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —