H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 3-1

Conchita Martínez holds a 3–1 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2003 Roland Garros second round 7-5 6-2.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
SUI Age 50 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Conchita Martínez #22 7-5 6-2 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #68 Match data
May 15, 2003* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Conchita Martínez #27 6-4 6-3 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #77 Match data
Mar 9, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #30 6-1 6-2 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #65 Match data
Jan 19, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Emmanuelle Gagliardi #93 5-7 6-3 8-6 Conchita Martínez #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Emmanuelle Gagliardi #736 #42 781 1,695 117 182 39.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Emmanuelle Gagliardi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1995 0–3 0.0% #229 1,464 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1996 2–1 66.7% #123 1,504 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1997 7–9 43.8% #78 1,531 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1998 5–12 29.4% #101 1,497 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1999 11–14 44.0% #68 1,563 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 2000 12–19 38.7% #95 1,550 0 0
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 2001 10–17 37.0% #69 1,548 0 0
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 2002 19–23 45.2% #61 1,583 0 0
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 2003 25–23 52.1% #56 1,608 0 0
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2004 8–18 30.8% #105 1,524 0 0
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 2005 10–15 40.0% #95 1,505 0 0
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 2006 7–17 29.2% #115 1,470 0 0
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 2007 1–10 9.1% #131 1,409 0 0
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 2008 0–1 0.0% #261 1,401 0 0
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33