H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Florencia Labat H2H: 3-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 3–0 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2000 Hilton Head round of 16 6-3 6-0.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 0
3 main-draw meetings
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Conchita Martínez #8 6-3 6-0 Florencia Labat #87 Match data Apr 21, 2000* R16 Hilton Head Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Conchita Martínez #2 6-1 2-6 6-2 Florencia Labat #36 Match data Mar 14, 1996* R32 Indian Wells Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Conchita Martínez #2 6-2 6-4 Florencia Labat #38 Match data Jan 19, 1996* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,867 191 184 50.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,482 0 0
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16 1992 18–17 51.4% #52 1,729 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,762 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,787 0 0
24 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,780 0 0
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28 1996 25–18 58.1% #42 1,771 0 0
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32 2000 8–10 44.4% #106 1,609 0 0
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32
32 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Conchita Martínez Florencia Labat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
17 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 11 10 21 52.4%
21 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 24 12 36 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1995 11 8 19 57.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0%
32 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
Career 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4% 106 84 190 55.8% 66 73 139 47.5% 12 12 24 50.0% 7 15 22 31.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Conchita Martínez Florencia Labat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1483 97.1 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.18
16 1988 1730 145.2 -22 -81 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57
17 1989 1928 154.3 -62 -75 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51
18 1990 2062 158.8 -43 -68 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28 1989 1546 110.9 +37 +1 47.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.8 +1.52
19 1991 2076 163.5 -95 +132 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74 1990 1573 118.7 +20 -15 42.5% -0.55 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) 104.5 +1.08
20 1992 2058 170.3 -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06 1991 1671 134.2 -10 -1 48.8% -0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 106.9 -0.64
21 1993 2160 168.9 -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51 1992 1730 132.2 +20 -68 50.6% +0.11 6–7 (46%) 0–1 +0.14
22 1994 2065 167.5 -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84 1993 1762 141.4 -20 +7 -160 56.0% +0.68 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.9 -1.64
23 1995 2182 174.1 -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30 1994 1788 139.9 -25 -123 58.3% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 -0.06
24 1996 2067 172.1 -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86 1995 1781 133.7 -26 +8 50.8% +0.17 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) -0.32
25 1997 2010 168.8 +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78 1996 1772 142.8 +32 -66 -49 57.0% +0.70 9–7 (56%) 4–4 (50%) 98.7 +0.20
26 1998 1968 163.0 -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15 1997 1675 134.1 +5 +54 +73 48.1% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 +1.02
27 1999 1898 159.2 -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25 1998 1656 126.6 +51 -6 +31 40.8% -0.83 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.12
28 2000 1923 160.0 -33 +232 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60 1999 1620 118.4 +82 -10 35.0% -1.25 1–1 -0.60
29 2001 1844 131.6 -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93 2000 1609 110.7 +27 +28 45.2% -0.74 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.45
30 2002 1756 136.7 +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17
31 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01
32 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78
33 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48
50 2022 1772
52 2024 1745
Career 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83 1868 138.5 +9 -5 -37 49.9% -0.02 67–55 (55%) 38–29 (57%) 106.9 +0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.