H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 6-1

Conchita Martínez holds a 6–1 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 3–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ginger Helgeson won the 1994 US Open round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main-draw meetings
Ginger Helgeson
USA Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ginger Helgeson #40 3-6 6-4 6-1 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data Sep 4, 1994* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Conchita Martínez #3 6-4 6-3 Ginger Helgeson #37 Match data Aug 5, 1994* R16 San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Conchita Martínez #3 6-2 6-3 Ginger Helgeson #35 Match data May 26, 1994* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Conchita Martínez #3 6-1 6-2 Ginger Helgeson #34 Match data Apr 2, 1994* QF Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Conchita Martínez #4 6-4 3-1 (ret.) Ginger Helgeson #50 Match data Nov 11, 1993* R32 Philadelphia Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Conchita Martínez #7 7-5 6-3 Ginger Helgeson #43 Match data Jun 23, 1993* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Conchita Martínez #6 7-5 6-2 Ginger Helgeson #52 Match data May 27, 1993* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33
Ginger Helgeson #467 #29 246 1,865 94 95 49.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Ginger Helgeson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7 — — — — — — —
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 — — — — — — —
20 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11 1989 0–2 0.0% #239 1,485 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16 1990 1–2 33.3% #246 1,498 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20 1991 17–17 50.0% #58 1,647 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1992 12–15 44.4% #71 1,648 0 0
24 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28 1993 22–20 52.4% #54 1,736 0 0
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28 1994 29–17 63.0% #30 1,777 0 1
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30 1995 8–7 53.3% #111 1,772 0 1
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1996 0–2 0.0% #792 1,721 0 1
28 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32 1997 3–8 27.3% #167 1,639 0 1
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32 1998 2–5 28.6% #152 1,572 0 1
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Conchita Martínez Ginger Helgeson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 1990 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1993 11 9 20 55.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 20 9 29 69.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1997 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4% — 55 50 105 52.4% 28 24 52 53.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 2 8 10 20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Conchita Martínez Ginger Helgeson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -75 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 2076 163.5 — — — — -95 +132 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06 1989 1486 104.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.02
21 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51 1990 1498 100.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — -0.32
22 1994 2065 167.5 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84 1991 1647 138.4 — — — — -14 +44 — 48.1% -0.22 6–3 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 106.2 -1.02
23 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30 1992 1649 128.8 — — — — +13 +33 -159 48.5% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 98.8 +0.26
24 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86 1993 1737 139.0 — — — — -44 -4 -162 52.6% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.91
25 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78 1994 1777 146.6 — — — — +6 -21 -203 61.0% +0.87 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 +1.21
26 1998 1968 163.0 — — — — -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15 1995 1773 137.3 — — — — -13 +12 — 60.0% +0.67 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — -0.56
27 1999 1898 159.2 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25 1996 1721 92.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.20
28 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60 1997 1639 107.6 — — — — -14 — -6 30.4% -1.22 0–1 — — -0.15
29 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93 1998 1573 99.1 — — — — +16 — — 41.2% -0.71 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 94.9 +1.00
30 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
50 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83 — 1865 140.4 — — — — -9 +11 -127 50.6% +0.14 23–28 (45%) 18–17 (51%) 99.4 -0.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.