H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Henrieta Nagyova H2H: 1-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 1–0 lead over Henrieta Nagyova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1998 Warsaw semifinal 6-2 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Henrieta Nagyova
SVK Age 47 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Conchita Martínez #7 6-2 4-6 6-2 Henrieta Nagyova #22 Match data Jul 18, 1998* SF Warsaw Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33
Henrieta Nagyova #723 #21 1,277 1,943 200 172 53.8% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Henrieta Nagyova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1 1995 1–1 50.0% #121 1,509 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4 1996 20–12 62.5% #37 1,702 0 1
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7 1997 24–18 57.1% #35 1,814 0 2
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1998 35–17 67.3% #28 1,834 0 4
20 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11 1999 25–22 53.2% #32 1,695 0 5
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16 2000 26–17 60.5% #40 1,807 0 8
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20 2001 26–22 54.2% #25 1,744 0 8
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 2002 21–25 45.7% #59 1,636 0 8
24 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28 2003 12–17 41.4% #91 1,634 0 9
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28 2004 5–11 31.2% #153 1,570 0 9
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30 2005 4–6 40.0% #145 1,568 0 9
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2006 1–4 20.0% #252 1,530 0 9
28 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32 — — — — — — —
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32 — — — — — — —
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Conchita Martínez Henrieta Nagyova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 4 2 6 66.7% 14 7 21 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1997 10 5 15 66.7% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1998 15 7 22 68.2% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1999 9 9 18 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
21 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 2000 12 9 21 57.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2001 15 12 27 55.6% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2002 6 13 19 31.6% 15 10 25 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2003 5 5 10 50.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2004 2 5 7 28.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2005 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
27 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2006 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4% — 82 75 157 52.2% 100 69 169 59.2% 5 13 18 27.8% 13 15 28 46.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Conchita Martínez Henrieta Nagyova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57 1995 1510 107.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.03
17 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -75 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51 1996 1702 124.3 — — — — -99 +43 — 57.1% +0.41 8–2 (80%) 4–3 (57%) 108.7 +0.58
18 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28 1997 1815 138.4 — — — — -72 -8 — 55.3% +0.10 6–8 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -1.11
19 1991 2076 163.5 — — — — -95 +132 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74 1998 1834 145.4 — — — — -69 +99 — 62.7% +0.92 12–4 (75%) 4–4 (50%) 106.8 -1.22
20 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06 1999 1696 137.0 — — — — +25 +148 — 55.8% +0.45 8–8 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 90.6 +0.64
21 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51 2000 1807 131.1 — — — — -23 +25 -311 60.0% +0.57 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 100.0 -0.09
22 1994 2065 167.5 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84 2001 1744 133.7 — — — — -9 +78 -212 55.0% +0.33 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 101.4 +0.12
23 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30 2002 1636 120.1 — — — — -15 +126 — 49.0% -0.16 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 +1.12
24 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86 2003 1635 115.0 -2.77 -0.87 0.763 43.3% 0 +48 — 48.4% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 2–0 — +0.09
25 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78 2004 1570 98.4 -2.57 -1.27 0.712 41.9% +10 +46 — 24.2% -1.97 3–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.34
26 1998 1968 163.0 — — — — -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15 2005 1569 109.7 — — — — +17 +9 — 46.2% -0.19 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.60
27 1999 1898 159.2 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25 2006 1530 106.3 -1.48 -0.80 0.858 47.1% +9 — — 20.0% -2.10 — — — +0.33
28 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
50 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83 — 1943 135.2 -2.27 -0.98 0.772 44.1% -24 +69 -254 53.8% +0.19 66–47 (58%) 29–29 (50%) 100.3 -0.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.