H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Iva Majoli H2H: 5-4

Conchita Martínez holds a 5–4 lead over Iva Majoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 4–3 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2002 Amelia Island third round 1-6 6-4 6-2.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 11, 2002* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Conchita Martínez #40 1-6 6-4 6-2 Iva Majoli #61 Match data
Jun 2, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Iva Majoli #10 7-6(1) 6-7(3) 6-3 Conchita Martínez #6 Match data
Apr 12, 1997* Amelia Island WTA 250 QF Clay Iva Majoli #9 1-6 6-3 6-3 Conchita Martínez #6 Match data
Nov 18, 1996 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals QF Carpet Iva Majoli #7 7-6 7-6 Conchita Martínez #4 Match data
May 11, 1996* Rome WTA 1000 SF Clay Conchita Martínez #3 6-4 6-7 6-2 Iva Majoli #4 Match data
Nov 13, 1995 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Conchita Martínez #2 1-6 7-5 6-0 Iva Majoli #9 Match data
Apr 1, 1995* Hilton Head WTA 1000 QF Clay Conchita Martínez #4 2-6 6-3 6-0 Iva Majoli #12 Match data
Apr 23, 1994* Barcelona WTA 250 QF Clay Iva Majoli #27 6-4 6-3 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data
Apr 2, 1994* Hilton Head WTA 1000 SF Clay Conchita Martínez #3 6-3 6-7 6-4 Iva Majoli #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Iva Majoli #777 #4 3,406 2,157 259 190 57.7% 1 3 0 0 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Iva Majoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1992 7–6 53.8% #50 1,624 0 0
15 1993 13–13 50.0% #46 1,736 0 0
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1994 38–19 66.7% #13 1,922 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1995 29–12 70.7% #9 2,046 0 2
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1996 39–16 70.9% #8 2,040 0 4
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1997 43–21 67.2% #6 1,947 1 7
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1998 23–20 53.5% #25 1,828 1 7
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1999 5–11 31.2% #164 1,694 1 7
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 2000 11–10 52.4% #62 1,703 1 7
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 2001 20–22 47.6% #44 1,697 1 7
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 2002 23–22 51.1% #32 1,668 1 8
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 2003 7–15 31.8% #131 1,589 1 8
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 2004 1–3 25.0% #321 1,564 1 8
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33