H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Jana Novotna H2H: 1-4

Jana Novotna holds a 4–1 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jana Novotna leads 4–0 on carpet, while Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1997 WTA Tour Championships fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Jana Novotna
CZE Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 17, 1997 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Jana Novotna #3 6-4 6-4 Conchita Martínez #10 Match data
Nov 1, 1997* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 SF Carpet Jana Novotna #2 6-4 6-1 Conchita Martínez #10 Match data
Aug 6, 1994* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Conchita Martínez #3 6-1 6-2 Jana Novotna #8 Match data
Oct 2, 1993* Leipzig WTA 250 SF Carpet Jana Novotna #8 6-1 6-1 Conchita Martínez #5 Match data
Oct 25, 1992* Brighton WTA 250 QF Carpet Jana Novotna #10 6-4 6-2 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Jana Novotna #18 #2 5,063 2,224 504 198 71.8% 1 4 1 5 13 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Jana Novotna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1986 0–4 0.0% #171 1,466 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1987 21–17 55.3% #47 1,752 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1988 23–18 56.1% #35 1,757 0 1
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1989 45–17 72.6% #11 1,962 0 2
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1990 40–16 71.4% #13 2,016 0 3
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1991 45–15 75.0% #7 2,072 0 5
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1992 36–17 67.9% #10 2,089 0 5
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1993 46–15 75.4% #6 2,103 0 7
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1994 43–11 79.6% #4 2,141 0 10
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1995 30–12 71.4% #11 2,031 0 11
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1996 47–12 79.7% #5 2,209 0 15
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 1997 52–15 77.6% #2 2,173 0 19
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 1998 50–14 78.1% #3 2,129 1 23
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 1999 26–15 63.4% #18 1,924 1 24
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —