H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 6-2 (incl. walkovers)

Conchita Martínez vs Julie Halard-Decugis: 5–2 excluding walkovers; 6–2 including 1 walkover. Across 8 main-draw results including walkovers, Conchita Martínez leads 4–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2000 Canadian Open round of 16 W/O.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H including walkovers
6 2
8 main-draw results
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Conchita Martínez #6 (w/o) Julie Halard-Decugis #19 Match data Aug 18, 2000* R16 Canadian Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Julie Halard-Decugis #9 7-5 6-2 Conchita Martínez #14 Match data Nov 11, 1999* R32 Philadelphia Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Conchita Martínez #3 6-7 6-0 6-3 Julie Halard-Decugis #27 Match data Aug 11, 1995* R16 Manhattan Beach Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Conchita Martínez #4 6-1 6-2 Julie Halard-Decugis #20 Match data Jun 4, 1995* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Julie Halard-Decugis #29 6-4 6-3 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data Jan 27, 1993* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Conchita Martínez #8 6-4 2-6 7-5 Julie Halard-Decugis #26 Match data Sep 21, 1991* SF Paris Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Conchita Martínez #11 1-6 6-4 6-4 Julie Halard-Decugis #39 Match data Apr 27, 1991* QF Barcelona Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Conchita Martínez #14 6-1 6-2 Julie Halard-Decugis #35 Match data Sep 22, 1990* SF Paris Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,024 340 221 60.6% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,612 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,624 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,707 0 0
20 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,820 0 1
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16 1992 23–14 62.2% #27 1,819 0 2
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,819 0 2
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,889 0 3
24 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,916 0 8
28 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,930 0 10
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32 2000 31–24 56.4% #15 1,837 0 12
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32
32 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Conchita Martínez Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1991 26 13 39 66.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 19 11 30 63.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1996 13 4 17 76.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1998 18 12 30 60.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 22 11 33 66.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 18 13 31 58.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0%
32 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
Career 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4% 164 109 273 60.1% 117 62 179 65.4% 31 17 48 64.6% 28 33 61 45.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Conchita Martínez Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1730 145.2 -22 -81 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57 1987 1643 124.0 -39 +21 58.8% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 5–1 (83%) 107.7 +1.12
17 1989 1928 154.3 -62 -75 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51 1988 1612 123.0 -40 +60 -85 45.0% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 2–7 (22%) 95.8 -0.31
18 1990 2062 158.8 -43 -68 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28 1989 1625 118.1 -29 -13 39.7% -0.70 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 -0.36
19 1991 2076 163.5 -95 +132 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74 1990 1708 138.4 -46 +7 -172 52.9% +0.32 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 102.8 -1.86
20 1992 2058 170.3 -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06 1991 1821 141.7 -31 +28 -239 59.2% +0.73 18–5 (78%) 5–1 (83%) 112.4 +1.15
21 1993 2160 168.9 -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51 1992 1819 144.0 -103 +139 -169 57.1% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 3–5 (38%) 104.1 -1.82
22 1994 2065 167.5 -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84 1993 1819 145.9 +15 +29 59.2% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 105.4 +1.92
23 1995 2182 174.1 -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30 1994 1890 153.5 -51 +106 60.0% +0.46 14–8 (64%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.05
24 1996 2067 172.1 -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86 1995 1771 131.9 -28 +220 55.1% +0.33 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.1 +0.60
25 1997 2010 168.8 +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78 1996 1856 152.1 -18 +132 69.0% +1.29 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 -0.28
26 1998 1968 163.0 -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15 1997 1843 108.4 33.3% -1.67 0–1 -0.22
27 1999 1898 159.2 -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25 1998 1917 157.6 -29 +48 -109 60.5% +0.78 7–7 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 100.1 -3.44
28 2000 1923 160.0 -33 +232 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60 1999 1930 160.9 -32 +91 -17 63.8% +0.88 14–5 (74%) 8–4 (67%) 110.3 +0.13
29 2001 1844 131.6 -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93 2000 1837 145.6 +5 +79 +214 52.5% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 102.6 +1.49
30 2002 1756 136.7 +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17
31 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01
32 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78
33 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48
50 2022 1772
52 2024 1745
Career 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83 2024 152.3 -27 +76 -46 57.5% +0.49 110–64 (63%) 67–50 (57%) 111.7 -0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.