H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 6-2

Conchita Martínez holds a 6–2 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 4–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2000 Montreal fourth round W/O.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 55 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 18, 2000* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #6 (w/o) Julie Halard-Decugis #19 Match data
Nov 11, 1999* Philadelphia WTA 250 R32 Carpet Julie Halard-Decugis #9 7-5 6-2 Conchita Martínez #14 Match data
Aug 11, 1995* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #3 6-7 6-0 6-3 Julie Halard-Decugis #27 Match data
Jun 4, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Conchita Martínez #4 6-1 6-2 Julie Halard-Decugis #20 Match data
Jan 27, 1993* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Julie Halard-Decugis #29 6-4 6-3 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data
Sep 21, 1991* Paris WTA 500 SF Clay Conchita Martínez #8 6-4 2-6 7-5 Julie Halard-Decugis #26 Match data
Apr 27, 1991* Barcelona WTA 250 QF Clay Conchita Martínez #11 1-6 6-4 6-4 Julie Halard-Decugis #39 Match data
Sep 22, 1990* Paris WTA 500 SF Clay Conchita Martínez #14 6-1 6-2 Julie Halard-Decugis #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,003 337 219 60.6% 0 0 0 3 9 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,613 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,625 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,708 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,821 0 1
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1992 22–13 62.9% #27 1,837 0 2
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,821 0 2
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,890 0 3
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,917 0 8
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,920 0 10
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 2000 29–23 55.8% #15 1,829 0 12
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33