H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Katerina Maleeva H2H: 6-1

Conchita Martínez holds a 6–1 lead over Katerina Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1995 Indian Wells fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Katerina Maleeva
BUL Age 57 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 3, 1995* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #4 6-2 6-2 Katerina Maleeva #37 Match data
Oct 13, 1994* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Conchita Martínez #3 7-5 6-2 Katerina Maleeva #37 Match data
Oct 30, 1993* Essen WTA 250 QF Hard Conchita Martínez #5 6-2 6-2 Katerina Maleeva #22 Match data
Nov 16, 1992 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Conchita Martínez #8 6-4 6-3 Katerina Maleeva #15 Match data
Oct 22, 1989* Bayonne WTA 250 F Hard Katerina Maleeva #17 6-2 6-2 Conchita Martínez #10 Match data
Jun 6, 1989* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #13 6-0 6-1 Katerina Maleeva #15 Match data
Aug 13, 1988* Sofia WTA 250 SF Hard Conchita Martínez #88 7-6 6-2 Katerina Maleeva #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Katerina Maleeva #456 #6 116 2,070 324 185 63.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Katerina Maleeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1984 2–2 50.0% #93 1,528 0 0
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1985 30–20 60.0% #28 1,813 0 2
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1986 24–20 54.5% #29 1,838 0 2
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1987 35–15 70.0% #13 1,948 0 4
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1988 35–16 68.6% #11 1,992 0 5
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1989 32–11 74.4% #15 1,940 0 8
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1990 47–16 74.6% #6 2,039 0 9
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1991 35–16 68.6% #11 1,967 0 10
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1992 30–18 62.5% #16 1,906 0 10
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1993 28–17 62.2% #22 1,898 0 10
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1994 20–16 55.6% #36 1,866 0 11
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1995 1–11 8.3% #302 1,679 0 11
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1996 5–7 41.7% #231 1,686 0 11
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 — — — — — — —
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 — — — — — — —
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —