H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 2-6

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 6–2 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 3–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 San Diego semifinal 6-2 7-5.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 6
8 main draw meetings
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 24, 1996* San Diego WTA 500 SF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 7-5 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data
Jul 3, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Kimiko Date Krumm 5-7 7-6 6-3 Conchita Martínez #2 Match data
Mar 13, 1996* Indian Wells WTA 1000 SF Hard Conchita Martínez #2 6-0 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Feb 5, 1995* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Carpet Kimiko Date Krumm 0-6 6-2 6-3 Conchita Martínez #4 Match data
Nov 14, 1994 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals QF Carpet Kimiko Date Krumm 2-6 6-4 7-6 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data
Jan 28, 1994* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 4-6 6-3 Conchita Martínez #4 Match data
Jan 15, 1994* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-3 6-0 Conchita Martínez #4 Match data
Mar 6, 1992* Boca Raton WTA 1000 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #8 6-1 7-6 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Kimiko Date Krumm 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1989 6–5 54.5% 1,562 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1990 10–7 58.8% 1,664 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1991 12–11 52.2% 1,725 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1992 26–13 66.7% 1,867 0 1
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1993 25–11 69.4% 1,956 0 2
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1994 32–12 72.7% 1,987 0 4
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1995 39–12 76.5% 2,029 0 5
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1996 31–13 70.5% 2,071 0 7
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33
37 2008 0–1 0.0% 2,042 0 7
38 2009 6–11 35.3% 1,841 0 8
39 2010 19–18 51.4% 1,814 0 8
40 2011 7–24 22.6% 1,567 0 8
41 2012 2–14 12.5% 1,454 0 8
42 2013 12–15 44.4% 1,575 0 8
43 2014 11–14 44.0% 1,597 0 8
44 2015 3–6 33.3% 1,574 0 8
46 2017 0–1 0.0% 1,564 0 8