H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 5-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 5–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1998 Wimbledon second round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Conchita Martínez #7 7-5 7-5 Kristie Boogert #82 Match data
Feb 1, 1997* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Conchita Martínez #4 7-6 1-6 6-3 Kristie Boogert #56 Match data
Mar 31, 1995* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #4 6-2 7-5 Kristie Boogert #67 Match data
Mar 11, 1995* Delray Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Conchita Martínez #4 6-4 7-6 Kristie Boogert #82 Match data
Jan 22, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Conchita Martínez #3 6-3 2-6 6-3 Kristie Boogert #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 104 139 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Kristie Boogert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,494 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,713 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,680 0 0
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,615 0 0
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,604 0 0
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 2000 11–13 45.8% #66 1,623 0 0
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,531 0 0
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,537 0 0
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —