H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 3-1

Conchita Martínez holds a 3–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1994 Brighton quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
URS 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 22, 1994* Brighton WTA 250 QF Carpet Larisa Savchenko #47 6-1 6-3 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data
May 25, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Conchita Martínez #3 6-2 6-3 Larisa Savchenko #50 Match data
Sep 30, 1993* Leipzig WTA 250 R32 Carpet Conchita Martínez #5 7-6 7-6 Larisa Savchenko #31 Match data
May 18, 1990* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #10 6-3 6-1 Larisa Savchenko #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 238 239 49.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Conchita Martínez Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0
1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,507 0 0
1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,683 0 0
1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,755 0 0
1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,792 0 0
1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1988 26–16 61.9% #16 1,861 0 0
1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,887 0 0
1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,715 0 0
1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,702 0 1
1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1992 18–18 50.0% #58 1,728 0 1
1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,755 0 2
1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,651 0 2
2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,669 0 2
2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,622 0 2
2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,654 0 2
2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,586 0 2
2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33