H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 6-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 6–0 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1994 Filderstadt fourth round 6-2 6-3.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 0
6 main draw meetings
GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 14, 1994* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #3 6-2 6-3 Leila Meskhi #35 Match data
Apr 8, 1994* Amelia Island WTA 250 R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #3 6-2 6-3 Leila Meskhi #32 Match data
Feb 27, 1993* Linz WTA 500 SF Carpet Conchita Martínez #8 6-2 6-2 Leila Meskhi #32 Match data
Aug 29, 1992* San Diego WTA 500 SF Carpet Conchita Martínez #8 3-6 7-6 6-2 Leila Meskhi #23 Match data
Jun 2, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #8 6-4 7-5 Leila Meskhi #20 Match data
Nov 11, 1990* Indianapolis WTA 250 F Hard Conchita Martínez #11 6-4 6-2 Leila Meskhi #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 2,001 192 119 61.7% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Leila Meskhi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,655 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1988 17–17 50.0% #46 1,688 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,794 0 1
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,937 0 4
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1992 26–15 63.4% #22 1,939 0 4
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,874 0 4
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,843 0 4
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,834 0 5
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,748 0 5
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33