H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Conchita Martínez holds a 3–1 lead over Lina Krasnoroutskaya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2004 Amelia Island round of 64 3-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conchita Martínez | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | Match data | Apr 7, 2004* | R64 | Amelia Island | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
| Lina Krasnoroutskaya | 7-6(5) 4-0 (ret.) | Conchita Martínez | Match data | Feb 15, 2003* | QF | Qatar Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Conchita Martínez | 3-6 6-3 2-0 (ret.) | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | Match data | Jan 16, 2002* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Conchita Martínez | 6-3 6-4 | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | Match data | Jul 4, 2001* | R16 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 676 | 279 | 70.8% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 16 | 33 |
| Lina Krasnoroutskaya | #424 | #25 | 1,173 | 1,807 | 65 | 70 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Conchita Martínez | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,927 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #34 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,061 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #28 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #8 | 2,057 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #141 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,159 | 0 | 16 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #424 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,064 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1996 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,066 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,010 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,967 | 1 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #5 | 1,922 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,843 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,755 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #42 | 1,752 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,799 | 1 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Conchita Martínez | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 16 | 1988 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2000 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | 1989 | 20 | 4 | 24 | 83.3% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2001 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 1990 | 17 | 3 | 20 | 85.0% | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2002 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 24 | 3 | 27 | 88.9% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2003 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1992 | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 21 | 5 | 26 | 80.8% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 2004 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1993 | 28 | 6 | 34 | 82.4% | 20 | 3 | 23 | 87.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1994 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 21 | 4 | 25 | 84.0% | 7 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1995 | 25 | 5 | 30 | 83.3% | 24 | 1 | 25 | 96.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1996 | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 17 | 5 | 22 | 77.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1997 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1998 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 17 | 4 | 21 | 81.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 20 | 6 | 26 | 76.9% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 20 | 5 | 25 | 80.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 291 | 137 | 428 | 68.0% | 279 | 85 | 364 | 76.6% | 48 | 19 | 67 | 71.6% | 58 | 38 | 96 | 60.4% | — | 36 | 37 | 73 | 49.3% | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Conchita Martínez | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1579 | 123.2 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 58.8% | +0.41 | 3–2 (60%) | — | — | -0.14 |
| 16 | 1988 | 1730 | 145.2 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -81 | — | 65.2% | +1.39 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–1 (80%) | 106.6 | +0.57 | 2000 | 1537 | 118.9 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -35 | +79 | 36.1% | -0.72 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–5 (29%) | 95.7 | 0.00 |
| 17 | 1989 | 1928 | 154.3 | — | — | — | — | -62 | -75 | — | 77.2% | +2.01 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–0 (100%) | 102.5 | +1.51 | 2001 | 1667 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -42 | -33 | +4 | 52.5% | +0.08 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.0 | +0.24 |
| 18 | 1990 | 2062 | 158.8 | — | — | — | — | -43 | -68 | — | 75.7% | +1.82 | 5–2 (71%) | 6–3 (67%) | 105.9 | -1.28 | 2002 | 1668 | 130.5 | — | — | — | — | -18 | — | — | 60.9% | +0.78 | 1–0 | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.27 |
| 19 | 1991 | 2076 | 163.5 | — | — | — | — | -95 | +132 | — | 72.1% | +1.48 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.7 | -3.74 | 2003 | 1770 | 139.6 | -1.59 | +2.62 | 0.954 | 48.8% | +1 | -150 | -121 | 49.5% | -0.07 | 8–5 (62%) | 4–6 (40%) | 102.5 | -3.07 |
| 20 | 1992 | 2058 | 170.3 | — | — | — | — | -34 | +215 | -444 | 70.6% | +1.60 | 8–7 (53%) | 5–0 (100%) | 103.4 | -3.06 | 2004 | 1654 | 119.7 | +0.11 | -0.29 | 0.998 | 49.9% | +3 | -25 | -39 | 41.3% | -0.57 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–2 (33%) | 93.0 | -0.12 |
| 21 | 1993 | 2160 | 168.9 | — | — | — | — | -45 | +158 | -369 | 79.8% | +2.22 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–2 (71%) | 102.8 | +1.51 | 2005 | 1649 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.06 |
| 22 | 1994 | 2065 | 167.5 | — | — | — | — | -60 | +202 | -125 | 72.3% | +1.80 | 13–5 (72%) | 5–6 (45%) | 103.9 | -0.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1995 | 2182 | 174.1 | — | — | — | — | -103 | +200 | -185 | 77.9% | +2.36 | 13–4 (76%) | 8–3 (73%) | 106.8 | -1.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1996 | 2067 | 172.1 | — | — | — | — | -13 | +243 | +14 | 70.6% | +1.81 | 8–7 (53%) | 3–8 (27%) | 93.2 | -0.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1997 | 2010 | 168.8 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +183 | +59 | 61.9% | +1.14 | 10–4 (71%) | 4–3 (57%) | 100.5 | -0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1998 | 1968 | 163.0 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +240 | +102 | 66.7% | +1.41 | 9–6 (60%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.0 | +0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 1898 | 159.2 | — | — | — | — | -48 | +259 | +117 | 60.1% | +0.91 | 11–7 (61%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.6 | -1.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 1923 | 160.0 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +232 | — | 65.1% | +0.97 | 13–5 (72%) | 7–1 (88%) | 106.8 | +0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 1844 | 131.6 | — | — | — | — | -41 | +234 | +229 | 58.9% | +0.57 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–1 (80%) | 94.7 | +2.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 1756 | 136.7 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +131 | +317 | 52.6% | +0.14 | 7–13 (35%) | 7–6 (54%) | 91.8 | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 1756 | 135.1 | +0.69 | +3.18 | 1.111 | 52.4% | -58 | +154 | +313 | 57.1% | +0.35 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.0 | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 1752 | 150.1 | +1.60 | +0.47 | 1.017 | 49.5% | -42 | +159 | +267 | 54.9% | +0.76 | 3–7 (30%) | 0–3 (0%) | 91.9 | -0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 1799 | 146.1 | -0.23 | +0.73 | 0.939 | 49.0% | +2 | +89 | +156 | 57.0% | +0.49 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.4 | -1.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 50 | 2022 | 1772 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 52 | 2024 | 1745 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2263 | 167.3 | +0.69 | +2.03 | 1.051 | 51.0% | -38 | +158 | +18 | 67.3% | +1.36 | 138–95 (59%) | 79–53 (60%) | 103.6 | -0.83 | — | 1807 | 136.9 | -0.95 | +1.53 | 0.969 | 49.3% | -8 | -74 | -14 | 48.8% | -0.09 | 20–21 (49%) | 15–20 (43%) | 99.3 | -2.53 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 4 | 14 | 18 | May 9, 2002 | H2H |
| Monica Seles | 1 | 17 | 18 | Mar 20, 2002 | H2H |
| Mary Pierce | 5 | 12 | 17 | Jul 31, 2003 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 14 | 3 | 17 | Jun 20, 2003 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 8 | 8 | 16 | Mar 5, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvia Farina Elia | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 4, 2004 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 7, 2004 | H2H |
| Jelena Dokic | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 20, 2002 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 4, 2004 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 2 | 1 | 3 | Oct 24, 2003 | H2H |