H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 3-3

Conchita Martínez and Lori Mcneil are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 2–1 on grass, while Lori Mcneil leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1996 Wimbledon third round 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Conchita Martínez #2 7-5 7-6 Lori Mcneil #50 Match data
Nov 11, 1995* Philadelphia WTA 1000 QF Carpet Lori Mcneil #63 6-7 6-3 6-2 Conchita Martínez #2 Match data
Jul 3, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Conchita Martínez #3 3-6 6-2 10-8 Lori Mcneil #22 Match data
Nov 16, 1992 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals QF Carpet Lori Mcneil #18 3-6 6-3 6-2 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data
Jun 19, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Lori Mcneil #25 6-0 6-3 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data
May 29, 1988* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Conchita Martínez #279 1-6 6-3 6-1 Lori Mcneil #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11