H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs María Sánchez Lorenzo H2H: 3-2

Conchita Martínez holds a 3–2 lead over María Sánchez Lorenzo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 2–1 on clay, while Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, María Sánchez Lorenzo won the 2004 Berlin second round 6-3 3-6 6-4.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 2004* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay María Sánchez Lorenzo #42 6-3 3-6 6-4 Conchita Martínez #18 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Conchita Martínez #7 6-3 6-2 María Sánchez Lorenzo #80 Match data
Aug 18, 1999* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R64 Hard Conchita Martínez #18 6-3 6-1 María Sánchez Lorenzo #38 Match data
Apr 10, 1998* Amelia Island WTA 250 R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #9 6-3 6-1 María Sánchez Lorenzo #55 Match data
May 3, 1997* Hamburg WTA 250 QF Clay María Sánchez Lorenzo #121 7-5 5-7 6-2 Conchita Martínez #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
María Sánchez Lorenzo #1,067 #33 939 1,727 127 180 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez María Sánchez Lorenzo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1994 3–4 42.9% #131 1,521 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1995 4–6 40.0% #125 1,554 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1996 4–11 26.7% #117 1,500 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1997 10–10 50.0% #53 1,636 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1998 10–21 32.3% #72 1,599 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1999 19–21 47.5% #41 1,670 0 1
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 2000 9–15 37.5% #97 1,606 0 1
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 2001 4–9 30.8% #214 1,566 0 1
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 2002 2–5 28.6% #111 1,519 0 1
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 2003 22–18 55.0% #42 1,655 0 1
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 2004 22–25 46.8% #51 1,654 0 1
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2005 9–20 31.0% #83 1,530 0 1
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 2006 9–15 37.5% #141 1,520 0 1
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33