H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Conchita Martínez vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 2-0
Conchita Martínez holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1991 Kitzbuhel fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 1991* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Conchita Martínez | 6-2 6-1 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1989* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-1 6-4 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Conchita Martínez | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |