H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Martina Navratilova H2H: 4-1

Conchita Martínez holds a 4–1 lead over Martina Navratilova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1994 Wimbledon final 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 4, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam F Grass Conchita Martínez #3 6-4 3-6 6-3 Martina Navratilova #4 Match data
May 8, 1994* Rome WTA 1000 F Clay Conchita Martínez #3 7-6 6-4 Martina Navratilova #4 Match data
May 8, 1993* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Conchita Martínez #8 6-1 6-4 Martina Navratilova #4 Match data
May 11, 1991* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Conchita Martínez #8 6-3 6-4 Martina Navratilova #4 Match data
May 12, 1990* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Martina Navratilova #2 6-2 6-0 Conchita Martínez #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Martina Navratilova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153
34 — — — — — — — 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158
35 — — — — — — — 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162
36 — — — — — — — 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167
37 — — — — — — — 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168
45 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168
47 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168
48 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168