H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 3-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 3–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1992 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Mary Lou Piatek

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 24, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Conchita Martínez #8 6-1 6-0 Mary Lou Piatek Match data
Apr 2, 1992* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R32 Clay Conchita Martínez #8 6-0 6-2 Mary Lou Piatek Match data
Feb 21, 1991* Oklahoma WTA 250 R32 Hard Conchita Martínez #11 6-2 6-0 Mary Lou Piatek Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Mary Lou Piatek — — — 1,936 153 206 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Conchita Martínez Mary Lou Piatek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,546 0 0
1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1980 16–12 57.1% — 1,737 0 0
1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1981 30–22 57.7% — 1,873 0 1
1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1982 18–21 46.2% — 1,792 0 1
1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1983 12–20 37.5% — 1,721 0 1
1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1984 18–20 47.4% — 1,703 0 2
1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1985 14–18 43.8% — 1,678 0 2
1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1986 8–15 34.8% — 1,619 0 2
1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 2
1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1988 6–16 27.3% — 1,542 0 2
1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1989 7–15 31.8% — 1,593 0 2
2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 1990 8–11 42.1% — 1,612 0 2
2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 1991 5–8 38.5% — 1,630 0 2
2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 1992 1–8 11.1% — 1,560 0 2
2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,555 0 2
2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —