H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 6-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 6–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1998 US Open first round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Conchita Martínez #7 6-1 6-2 Miriam Oremans #47 Match data
Jan 23, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Conchita Martínez #11 7-5 6-2 Miriam Oremans #48 Match data
Jan 15, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Conchita Martínez #5 6-0 6-2 Miriam Oremans #44 Match data
Jun 1, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Conchita Martínez #4 6-2 6-3 Miriam Oremans #31 Match data
Jan 24, 1993* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Conchita Martínez #8 6-3 4-6 6-4 Miriam Oremans #123 Match data
Jan 8, 1993* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #8 6-3 3-6 6-3 Miriam Oremans #138 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —