H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Monica Seles H2H: 1-17

Monica Seles holds a 17–1 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 18 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 8–1 on hard courts and 7–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Miami second round 5-7 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 17
18 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 20, 2002* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Monica Seles #6 5-7 6-4 6-3 Conchita Martínez #43 Match data
Apr 16, 2000* Amelia Island WTA 500 F Clay Monica Seles #9 6-3 6-2 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data
Sep 25, 1999* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Monica Seles #5 6-2 6-0 Conchita Martínez #16 Match data
Jun 3, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Monica Seles #3 6-1 6-4 Conchita Martínez #22 Match data
Apr 10, 1999* Amelia Island WTA 250 SF Clay Monica Seles #4 6-0 6-1 Conchita Martínez #17 Match data
Mar 21, 1999* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Monica Seles #3 6-2 6-1 Conchita Martínez #18 Match data
Aug 16, 1997* Canadian Open WTA 1000 SF Hard Monica Seles #3 6-2 7-6 Conchita Martínez #9 Match data
Jul 26, 1997* Stanford WTA 250 QF Hard Conchita Martínez #11 7-6 6-4 Monica Seles #3 Match data
Apr 5, 1997* Hilton Head WTA 1000 SF Clay Monica Seles #5 6-3 6-4 Conchita Martínez #6 Match data
Sep 7, 1996* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Monica Seles #1 6-4 6-3 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data
Sep 9, 1995* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-2 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data
Feb 20, 1993* Paris WTA 500 SF Hard Monica Seles #1 6-1 6-1 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data
Mar 1, 1992* Indian Wells WTA 1000 F Hard Monica Seles #1 6-3 6-1 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data
Oct 5, 1991* Milan WTA 250 SF Carpet Monica Seles #1 6-3 6-3 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data
Jun 6, 1991* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Monica Seles #1 6-0 7-5 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data
May 19, 1990* Berlin WTA 1000 QF Clay Monica Seles #3 6-0 6-3 Conchita Martínez #10 Match data
Apr 21, 1990* Tampa WTA 250 SF Clay Monica Seles #3 6-4 6-0 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data
Nov 13, 1989 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Monica Seles #7 6-0 6-1 Conchita Martínez #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 — — — — — — —
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —