H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Monica Seles H2H: 1-17

Monica Seles holds a 17–1 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 18 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 8–1 on hard courts and 7–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Miami Open round of 64 5-7 6-4 6-3.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 17
18 main-draw meetings
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Seles #6 5-7 6-4 6-3 Conchita Martínez #43 Match data Mar 20, 2002* R64 Miami Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Monica Seles #9 6-3 6-2 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data Apr 16, 2000* F Amelia Island Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Monica Seles #5 6-2 6-0 Conchita Martínez #16 Match data Sep 25, 1999* QF Toyota Princess Cup Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Monica Seles #3 6-1 6-4 Conchita Martínez #22 Match data Jun 3, 1999* QF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Monica Seles #4 6-0 6-1 Conchita Martínez #17 Match data Apr 10, 1999* SF Amelia Island Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Monica Seles #3 6-2 6-1 Conchita Martínez #18 Match data Mar 21, 1999* R32 Key Biscayne Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Monica Seles #3 6-2 7-6 Conchita Martínez #9 Match data Aug 16, 1997* SF Canadian Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Conchita Martínez #11 7-6 6-4 Monica Seles #3 Match data Jul 26, 1997* QF Stanford Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Monica Seles #5 6-3 6-4 Conchita Martínez #6 Match data Apr 5, 1997* SF Hilton Head Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Monica Seles #1 6-4 6-3 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data Sep 7, 1996* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-2 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data Sep 9, 1995* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Monica Seles #1 6-1 6-1 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data Feb 20, 1993* SF Paris Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Monica Seles #1 6-3 6-1 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data Feb 24, 1992 F Indian Wells Open Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Monica Seles #1 6-3 6-3 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data Oct 5, 1991* SF Milan Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Monica Seles #1 6-0 7-5 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data Jun 6, 1991* QF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Monica Seles #3 6-0 6-3 Conchita Martínez #10 Match data May 19, 1990* QF Berlin Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Monica Seles #3 6-4 6-0 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data Apr 21, 1990* SF Tampa Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Monica Seles #7 6-0 6-1 Conchita Martínez #10 Match data Nov 13, 1989 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 586 123 82.7% 9 9 3 21 11 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,599 0 0
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,005 0 1
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,296 1 10
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,444 4 20
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,500 7 30
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,486 8 32
20 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,488 8 33
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20 1996 46–9 83.6% #2 2,344 9 38
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,180 9 41
24 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,180 9 43
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,120 9 44
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30 2000 56–13 81.2% #4 2,153 9 47
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,132 9 51
28 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,091 9 53
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,994 9 53
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32
32 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Conchita Martínez Monica Seles
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 5 3 8 62.5%
15 1989 6 2 8 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7%
16 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1990 18 2 20 90.0% 22 0 22 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
17 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 40 3 43 93.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 15 1 16 93.8%
18 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 33 3 36 91.7% 19 1 20 95.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 12 0 12 100.0%
19 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 11 1 12 91.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
20 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
21 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 1995 11 1 12 91.7%
22 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 29 2 31 93.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
23 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 27 5 32 84.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1998 20 5 25 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 21 7 28 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 28 9 37 75.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 1 8 87.5%
27 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2001 36 9 45 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 0 4 100.0%
28 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 27 8 35 77.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
29 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0%
32 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
Career 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4% 316 63 379 83.4% 142 25 167 85.0% 35 11 46 76.1% 93 24 117 79.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Conchita Martínez Monica Seles
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1600 134.7 +49 58.8% +0.29 1–0 2–1 (67%) -0.41
15 1989 2005 170.5 -46 -209 -385 75.8% +2.03 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 107.2 -0.76
16 1988 1730 145.2 -22 -81 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57 1990 2297 179.4 -85 -99 -561 84.8% +2.78 7–3 (70%) 7–1 (88%) 110.0 -3.90
17 1989 1928 154.3 -62 -75 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51 1991 2445 183.7 0 -66 86.9% +3.17 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 105.2 -3.24
18 1990 2062 158.8 -43 -68 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28 1992 2501 182.5 +9 -35 -586 88.2% +3.24 10–1 (91%) 2–2 (50%) 107.7 -2.26
19 1991 2076 163.5 -95 +132 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74 1993 2486 173.2 +21 -78 85.4% +3.27 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) -0.84
20 1992 2058 170.3 -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06
21 1993 2160 168.9 -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51 1995 2488 169.9 +5 92.0% +3.80 0–1 1–1 -0.63
22 1994 2065 167.5 -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84 1996 2344 176.3 +27 +5 -308 83.5% +2.58 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 96.5 -0.42
23 1995 2182 174.1 -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30 1997 2181 174.0 +75 +103 -181 72.3% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 6–9 (40%) 90.3 -0.17
24 1996 2067 172.1 -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86 1998 2180 173.5 +55 +77 -125 70.2% +1.77 10–5 (67%) 4–7 (36%) 95.0 -1.32
25 1997 2010 168.8 +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78 1999 2120 173.1 +56 +123 -164 73.3% +2.05 3–2 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 97.5 -0.29
26 1998 1968 163.0 -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15 2000 2153 175.3 +19 +110 -86 78.0% +2.03 9–5 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 106.4 -2.96
27 1999 1898 159.2 -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25 2001 2132 162.9 +27 73.5% +1.72 10–5 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 95.6 +1.21
28 2000 1923 160.0 -33 +232 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60 2002 2091 167.1 +54 +166 +47 70.1% +1.67 14–4 (78%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 -1.76
29 2001 1844 131.6 -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93 2003 1995 139.5 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +112 +183 56.8% +0.57 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -0.67
30 2002 1756 136.7 +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17
31 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01
32 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78
33 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48
50 2022 1772
52 2024 1745
Career 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83 2541 181.1 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +21 +17 -276 78.2% +2.32 102–45 (69%) 69–52 (57%) 102.4 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.