Home
/
H2H
/
Conchita Martínez vs Monica Seles
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Conchita Martínez vs Monica Seles H2H: 1-17
Monica Seles holds a 17–1 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 18 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 8–1 on hard courts and 7–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Miami Open round of 64 5-7 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
17
18 main-draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Monica Seles
#6
5-7 6-4 6-3
Conchita Martínez
#43
Match data
Mar 20, 2002*
R64
Miami Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Monica Seles
#9
6-3 6-2
Conchita Martínez
#8
Match data
Apr 16, 2000*
F
Amelia Island
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Clay
Monica Seles
#5
6-2 6-0
Conchita Martínez
#16
Match data
Sep 25, 1999*
QF
Toyota Princess Cup
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Monica Seles
#3
6-1 6-4
Conchita Martínez
#22
Match data
Jun 3, 1999*
QF
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
Monica Seles
#4
6-0 6-1
Conchita Martínez
#17
Match data
Apr 10, 1999*
SF
Amelia Island
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Clay
Monica Seles
#3
6-2 6-1
Conchita Martínez
#18
Match data
Mar 21, 1999*
R32
Key Biscayne
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Monica Seles
#3
6-2 7-6
Conchita Martínez
#9
Match data
Aug 16, 1997*
SF
Canadian Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Conchita Martínez
#11
7-6 6-4
Monica Seles
#3
Match data
Jul 26, 1997*
QF
Stanford
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Monica Seles
#5
6-3 6-4
Conchita Martínez
#6
Match data
Apr 5, 1997*
SF
Hilton Head
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Clay
Monica Seles
#1
6-4 6-3
Conchita Martínez
#3
Match data
Sep 7, 1996*
SF
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Monica Seles
#1
6-2 6-2
Conchita Martínez
#3
Match data
Sep 9, 1995*
SF
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Monica Seles
#1
6-1 6-1
Conchita Martínez
#8
Match data
Feb 20, 1993*
SF
Paris
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Monica Seles
#1
6-3 6-1
Conchita Martínez
#8
Match data
Feb 24, 1992
F
Indian Wells Open
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Monica Seles
#1
6-3 6-3
Conchita Martínez
#8
Match data
Oct 5, 1991*
SF
Milan
Tier III
→
modern equivalent
WTA 250
Carpet
Monica Seles
#1
6-0 7-5
Conchita Martínez
#8
Match data
Jun 6, 1991*
QF
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
Monica Seles
#3
6-0 6-3
Conchita Martínez
#10
Match data
May 19, 1990*
QF
Berlin Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Clay
Monica Seles
#3
6-4 6-0
Conchita Martínez
#8
Match data
Apr 21, 1990*
SF
Tampa
Tier III
→
modern equivalent
WTA 250
Clay
Monica Seles
#7
6-0 6-1
Conchita Martínez
#10
Match data
Nov 13, 1989
R16
WTA Finals
WTA Finals
Carpet
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Conchita Martínez
#1,498
#2
3,180
2,263
676
279
70.8%
1
9
0
7
16
33
Monica Seles
#223
#1
4,056
2,540
586
123
82.7%
9
9
3
21
11
53
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
14
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1988
5–3
62.5%
#86
1,599
0
0
15
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1989
33–9
78.6%
#6
2,005
0
1
16
1988
14–6
70.0%
#41
1,729
0
1
1990
55–6
90.2%
#2
2,296
1
10
17
1989
35–9
79.5%
#7
1,927
0
4
1991
74–6
92.5%
#1
2,444
4
20
18
1990
38–10
79.2%
#11
2,061
0
7
1992
70–5
93.3%
#1
2,500
7
30
19
1991
36–12
75.0%
#9
2,076
0
10
1993
17–2
89.5%
#8
2,486
8
32
20
1992
47–17
73.4%
#8
2,057
0
11
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
21
1993
66–13
83.5%
#4
2,159
0
16
1995
11–1
91.7%
#1
2,488
8
33
22
1994
51–14
78.5%
#3
2,064
1
20
1996
46–9
83.6%
#2
2,344
9
38
23
1995
57–10
85.1%
#2
2,182
1
26
1997
45–14
76.3%
#5
2,180
9
41
24
1996
47–17
73.4%
#5
2,066
1
28
1998
42–13
76.4%
#6
2,180
9
43
25
1997
37–19
66.1%
#12
2,010
1
28
1999
36–12
75.0%
#6
2,120
9
44
26
1998
38–16
70.4%
#8
1,967
1
30
2000
56–13
81.2%
#4
2,153
9
47
27
1999
38–22
63.3%
#15
1,898
1
31
2001
40–10
80.0%
#10
2,132
9
51
28
2000
49–20
71.0%
#5
1,922
1
32
2002
46–13
78.0%
#7
2,091
9
53
29
2001
19–13
59.4%
#35
1,843
1
32
2003
10–7
58.8%
#60
1,994
9
53
30
2002
26–24
52.0%
#34
1,755
1
32
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31
2003
29–21
58.0%
#18
1,755
1
32
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
2004
20–17
54.1%
#42
1,752
1
32
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
2005
29–19
60.4%
#31
1,799
1
33
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
14
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1988
5
3
8
62.5%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
15
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1989
6
2
8
75.0%
10
1
11
90.9%
3
1
4
75.0%
14
5
19
73.7%
16
1988
5
1
6
83.3%
6
4
10
60.0%
—
—
—
—
3
1
4
75.0%
1990
18
2
20
90.0%
22
0
22
100.0%
4
1
5
80.0%
11
3
14
78.6%
17
1989
20
4
24
83.3%
13
3
16
81.3%
—
—
—
—
2
2
4
50.0%
1991
40
3
43
93.0%
19
2
21
90.5%
—
—
—
—
15
1
16
93.8%
18
1990
17
3
20
85.0%
18
5
23
78.3%
—
—
—
—
3
2
5
60.0%
1992
33
3
36
91.7%
19
1
20
95.0%
6
1
7
85.7%
12
0
12
100.0%
19
1991
8
6
14
57.1%
24
3
27
88.9%
—
—
—
—
4
3
7
57.1%
1993
11
1
12
91.7%
2
1
3
66.7%
—
—
—
—
4
0
4
100.0%
20
1992
13
5
18
72.2%
21
5
26
80.8%
3
2
5
60.0%
10
5
15
66.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
21
1993
28
6
34
82.4%
20
3
23
87.0%
5
1
6
83.3%
13
3
16
81.3%
1995
11
1
12
91.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
22
1994
20
7
27
74.1%
21
4
25
84.0%
7
0
7
100.0%
3
3
6
50.0%
1996
29
2
31
93.5%
6
2
8
75.0%
5
1
6
83.3%
6
4
10
60.0%
23
1995
25
5
30
83.3%
24
1
25
96.0%
5
1
6
83.3%
3
3
6
50.0%
1997
27
5
32
84.4%
13
4
17
76.5%
3
2
5
60.0%
2
3
5
40.0%
24
1996
19
7
26
73.1%
17
5
22
77.3%
4
2
6
66.7%
7
3
10
70.0%
1998
20
5
25
80.0%
11
4
15
73.3%
4
1
5
80.0%
7
3
10
70.0%
25
1997
17
8
25
68.0%
14
6
20
70.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
4
4
8
50.0%
1999
21
7
28
75.0%
11
2
13
84.6%
2
2
4
50.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
26
1998
18
9
27
66.7%
17
4
21
81.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
1
2
3
33.3%
2000
28
9
37
75.7%
17
2
19
89.5%
4
1
5
80.0%
7
1
8
87.5%
27
1999
14
11
25
56.0%
20
6
26
76.9%
2
1
3
66.7%
2
4
6
33.3%
2001
36
9
45
80.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
4
0
4
100.0%
28
2000
25
12
37
67.6%
20
5
25
80.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
3
2
5
60.0%
2002
27
8
35
77.1%
9
2
11
81.8%
4
1
5
80.0%
6
2
8
75.0%
29
2001
4
4
8
50.0%
10
6
16
62.5%
5
2
7
71.4%
0
1
1
0.0%
2003
4
3
7
57.1%
3
3
6
50.0%
—
—
—
—
3
1
4
75.0%
30
2002
16
14
30
53.3%
8
9
17
47.1%
2
1
3
66.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31
2003
13
13
26
50.0%
10
6
16
62.5%
6
2
8
75.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
2004
9
10
19
47.4%
10
5
15
66.7%
1
2
3
33.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
2005
20
12
32
62.5%
6
5
11
54.5%
3
2
5
60.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
291
137
428
68.0%
279
85
364
76.6%
48
19
67
71.6%
58
38
96
60.4%
—
316
63
379
83.4%
142
25
167
85.0%
35
11
46
76.1%
93
24
117
79.5%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.