H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Nana Smith H2H: 1-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 1–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1994 Wimbledon round of 64 6-1 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Conchita Martínez #3 6-1 7-6 Nana Smith #181 Match data Jun 24, 1994* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Conchita Martínez Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Conchita Martínez Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -75 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1991 2076 163.5 — — — — -95 +132 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1994 2065 167.5 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 1998 1968 163.0 — — — — -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 1999 1898 159.2 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
30 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
50 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.