H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Conchita Martínez vs Natalia Baudone H2H: 2-0
Conchita Martínez holds a 2–0 lead over Natalia Baudone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1994 San Diego third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 1994* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-0 6-4 | Natalia Baudone | Match data |
| May 30, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Conchita Martínez | 6-0 7-5 | Natalia Baudone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
| Natalia Baudone | #934 | #71 | 126 | 1,682 | 38 | 58 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Conchita Martínez | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #101 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |