H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Conchita Martínez vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 4-0
Conchita Martínez holds a 4–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1993 San Diego fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1993* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-1 6-3 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| May 7, 1993* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Conchita Martínez | 6-1 6-0 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1992* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Conchita Martínez | 6-4 6-1 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1990* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Conchita Martínez | 6-1 6-3 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Conchita Martínez | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |