H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 1-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 1–0 lead over Rosalyn Fairbank in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1993 Filderstadt fourth round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 15, 1993* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #5 6-2 6-0 Rosalyn Fairbank #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1