H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 4-2

Conchita Martínez holds a 4–2 lead over Sabine Appelmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2000 Gold Coast quarterfinal 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Conchita Martínez #15 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #30 Match data Jan 8, 2000* QF Gold Coast Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Conchita Martínez #17 6-2 4-6 6-2 Sabine Appelmans #94 Match data Mar 10, 1999* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Sabine Appelmans #18 2-6 7-5 6-1 Conchita Martínez #5 Match data Jan 22, 1997* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Conchita Martínez #3 4-6 6-4 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #22 Match data Nov 2, 1996* SF Kremlin Cup Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Sabine Appelmans #23 6-4 6-4 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data Oct 18, 1996* R16 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Conchita Martínez #5 6-3 7-5 Sabine Appelmans #42 Match data Oct 30, 1993* SF Essen Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,925 284 205 58.1% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Sabine Appelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,467 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2
20 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11 1992 29–16 64.4% #26 1,895 0 3
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,834 0 3
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6
24 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28 1996 26–17 60.5% #21 1,832 0 7
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,855 0 7
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,722 0 7
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,778 0 7
28 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32 2000 22–23 48.9% #49 1,697 0 7
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,689 0 7
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Conchita Martínez Sabine Appelmans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 15 6 21 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0%
19 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1991 26 8 34 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 1993 7 8 15 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
22 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
23 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1996 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 4 16 75.0%
25 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1997 12 10 22 54.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 9 18 50.0%
26 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 1 4 5 20.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
27 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1999 11 8 19 57.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
28 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 13 12 25 52.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4% — 139 90 229 60.7% 54 49 103 52.4% 22 17 39 56.4% 69 49 118 58.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Conchita Martínez Sabine Appelmans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1502 99.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.17 1–1 — — +0.44
16 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.57 1988 1498 106.4 — — — — — +40 — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.03
17 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -75 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.51 1989 1468 98.3 — — — — +65 +26 — 31.3% -0.50 1–1 0–2 — +0.98
18 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.28 1990 1679 133.0 — — — — +19 -159 — 59.2% +0.76 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) — +2.93
19 1991 2076 163.5 — — — — -95 +132 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) — -3.74 1991 1873 150.3 — — — — +27 -285 — 69.9% +1.36 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +1.14
20 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) — -3.06 1992 1896 145.1 — — — — +3 -146 — 61.0% +0.64 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.44
21 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.51 1993 1835 135.0 — — — — +9 -112 -193 53.1% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.40
22 1994 2065 167.5 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.84 1994 1822 144.0 — — — — +46 -108 — 58.0% +0.80 10–2 (83%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.26
23 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) — -1.30 1995 1809 140.0 — — — — -2 -18 — 57.6% +0.37 5–5 (50%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.91
24 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.86 1996 1833 145.6 — — — — -10 -70 -165 62.1% +0.81 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.59
25 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.78 1997 1855 155.7 — — — — -46 -8 -89 58.7% +0.54 9–14 (39%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.41
26 1998 1968 163.0 — — — — -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.15 1998 1722 138.4 — — — — +60 +2 +76 47.1% -0.26 1–9 (10%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.30
27 1999 1898 159.2 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.25 1999 1778 137.2 — — — — +27 -92 -38 56.3% +0.48 5–8 (38%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.07
28 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) — +0.60 2000 1697 139.6 — — — — +36 -31 +95 48.5% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.37
29 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) — +2.93 2001 1689 101.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.19
30 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
50 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83 — 1925 148.8 — — — — +14 -69 -45 57.1% +0.51 71–69 (51%) 40–49 (45%) 95.3 +0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.