H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 4-2

Conchita Martínez holds a 4–2 lead over Sabine Appelmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2000 Gold Coast quarterfinal 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 2000* Gold Coast WTA 500 QF Hard Conchita Martínez #15 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #30 Match data
Mar 7, 1999* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Conchita Martínez #17 6-2 4-6 6-2 Sabine Appelmans #94 Match data
Jan 22, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Sabine Appelmans #18 2-6 7-5 6-1 Conchita Martínez #5 Match data
Nov 2, 1996* Kremlin Cup WTA 250 SF Carpet Conchita Martínez #3 4-6 6-4 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #22 Match data
Oct 18, 1996* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Sabine Appelmans #23 6-4 6-4 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data
Oct 30, 1993* Essen WTA 250 SF Hard Conchita Martínez #5 6-3 7-5 Sabine Appelmans #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,923 279 202 58.0% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Sabine Appelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,468 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1992 26–15 63.4% #26 1,875 0 3
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,828 0 3
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1996 26–16 61.9% #21 1,843 0 7
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,856 0 7
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,721 0 7
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,777 0 7
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 2000 20–22 47.6% #49 1,692 0 7
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,685 0 7
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —