H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 6-2

Conchita Martínez holds a 6–2 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 3–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2002 Amelia Island fourth round 5-7 6-4 7-6(6).

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 12, 2002* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Sandrine Testud #11 5-7 6-4 7-6(6) Conchita Martínez #40 Match data
Jul 17, 1999* Sopot WTA 250 SF Clay Conchita Martínez #18 6-3 6-3 Sandrine Testud #17 Match data
Oct 25, 1998* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 QF Carpet Sandrine Testud #15 7-6 7-5 Conchita Martínez #7 Match data
May 15, 1998* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #9 4-6 7-5 6-2 Sandrine Testud #13 Match data
Jan 30, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Conchita Martínez #11 6-3 6-2 Sandrine Testud #12 Match data
Nov 1, 1997* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 QF Carpet Conchita Martínez #10 6-1 6-4 Sandrine Testud #13 Match data
May 10, 1996* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #3 6-0 6-1 Sandrine Testud #34 Match data
Sep 1, 1993* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Conchita Martínez #5 6-2 6-3 Sandrine Testud #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,019 309 236 56.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Sandrine Testud
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,546 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,566 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,560 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,771 0 0
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,938 0 1
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,946 0 2
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,916 0 2
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,976 0 3
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,845 0 3
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 2004 1–7 12.5% #313 1,739 0 3
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33