H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Shi-Ting Wang H2H: 1-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 1–0 lead over Shi-Ting Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1997 Toyota Princess Cup round of 16 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Shi-Ting Wang
TPE Age 52 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Conchita Martínez #11 6-1 6-3 Shi-Ting Wang #43 Match data Sep 19, 1997* R16 Toyota Princess Cup Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33
Shi-Ting Wang #457 #26 707 1,831 129 106 54.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Shi-Ting Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7 1992 12–12 50.0% #54 1,604 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1993 21–9 70.0% #30 1,780 0 2
20 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11 1994 21–12 63.6% #42 1,775 0 3
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16 1995 17–9 65.4% #44 1,775 0 4
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20 1996 26–16 61.9% #40 1,804 0 6
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1997 15–18 45.5% #68 1,681 0 6
24 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28 1998 13–17 43.3% #58 1,642 0 6
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28 1999 4–11 26.7% #153 1,583 0 6
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30 — — — — — — —
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 — — — — — — —
28 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32 — — — — — — —
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32 — — — — — — —
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Conchita Martínez Shi-Ting Wang
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 18 6 24 75.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1994 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 1995 15 7 22 68.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 24 14 38 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 11 9 20 55.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1998 12 10 22 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4% — 112 72 184 60.9% 10 18 28 35.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Conchita Martínez Shi-Ting Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1492 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.01
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1479 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.10
16 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -75 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28 1992 1605 131.1 — — — — +40 — — 50.9% +0.09 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.89
19 1991 2076 163.5 — — — — -95 +132 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74 1993 1780 139.9 — — — — +28 — — 65.7% +1.22 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 102.1 +0.48
20 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06 1994 1776 134.4 — — — — +9 -187 — 59.7% +0.78 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 102.0 +0.94
21 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51 1995 1776 128.1 — — — — -3 -152 — 62.3% +1.00 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — +1.57
22 1994 2065 167.5 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84 1996 1805 138.2 — — — — +7 -168 — 62.8% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 3–2 (60%) 96.0 +1.15
23 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30 1997 1682 134.5 — — — — +63 -61 -72 48.0% +0.09 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 -0.92
24 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86 1998 1643 128.9 — — — — +100 -94 -61 44.4% -0.51 6–6 (50%) 1–0 — -0.80
25 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78 1999 1584 118.9 — — — — +82 -54 — 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -1.22
26 1998 1968 163.0 — — — — -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 1898 159.2 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
50 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83 — 1832 139.5 — — — — +33 -105 -66 54.4% +0.34 36–38 (49%) 18–14 (56%) 99.8 +0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.