H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 1-1

Conchita Martínez and Silvija Talaja are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2005 Pattaya fourth round 7-5 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 4, 2005* Pattaya WTA 250 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #43 7-5 2-6 7-5 Silvija Talaja #105 Match data
Jan 9, 2000* Gold Coast WTA 500 F Hard Silvija Talaja #29 6-0 0-6 6-4 Conchita Martínez #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 130 151 46.3% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Silvija Talaja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,588 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,555 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,603 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,700 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 2000 24–27 47.1% #29 1,647 0 2
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,543 0 2
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,559 0 2
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,543 0 2
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 — — — — — — —
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 — — — — — — —
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —